'This is a party built to lose competitive elections,' columnist WarOnDumb writes of the dysfunctional Alabama Democratic Party. 'And the US Supreme Court just gave it a new one to lose.'
If Alabama Democrats have proved anything in the last 15 years, it’s that they will blow a party-competitive election.The Milligan decision should be good news for Dems, but it’s worth pointing out that the state party didn’t really do anything to deserve it. Doing things is not the party’s strength these days.
To win, setting aside who actually turns out to vote, white Democrats would have to close the gap to 50 percent. Doable, but not guaranteed. The parties will go back to the district court this week, where Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall has said he intends to fight on. But the easiest thing here for Alabama Republicans to do would be to pass the Singleton plan and suit up.And Joe Reed owns a piece of that, just as Republicans do.Reed’s faction abolished the party committee’s youth caucus.Reed’s faction abolished that caucus, too.Gone. Reed’s group tossed them aside.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court ruling in Alabama case could aid election lawsuits in MississippiMultiple lawsuits alleging that Mississippi legislative and judicial districts dilute Black voter strength could be bolstered by the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. Supreme Court rejects challenge to Alabama county bail systemThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to decide whether requiring criminal defendants to pay a fixed amount of cash bail to secure their release from jail before trial violates the U.S. Constitution.
Baca lebih lajut »
Why the Supreme Court's Alabama election map decision was surprising to manyABC News’ Linsey Davis spoke to Michael Waldman about the impact of the decision and his new book, “The Super Majority: How the Supreme Court Divided America.”
Baca lebih lajut »
Where Texas redistricting lawsuits stand after U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Alabama caseThe high court left intact a key provision of the federal Voting Rights Act in a case many feared would go the other way. The decision’s importance in ongoing litigation over Texas’ political maps will largely be felt in what didn’t happen. tx kprc2
Baca lebih lajut »
Where Texas redistricting lawsuits stand after U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Alabama caseThe high court left intact a key provision of the federal Voting Rights Act in a case many feared would go the other way. The decision’s importance in ongoing litigation over Texas’ political maps will largely be felt in what didn’t happen.
Baca lebih lajut »
Federal judges to discuss Alabama’s congressional map after Supreme Court rulingThe three-judge panel of judges overseeing a lawsuit over Alabama’s congressional map have scheduled a status conference for Friday, after the U.S. Supreme Court sided with their initial ruling that the maps may violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Baca lebih lajut »