Supreme Court ruling in Alabama case could aid election lawsuits in Mississippi

Indonesia Berita Berita

Supreme Court ruling in Alabama case could aid election lawsuits in Mississippi
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 MSTODAYnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 6 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 6%
  • Publisher: 63%

Multiple lawsuits alleging that Mississippi legislative and judicial districts dilute Black voter strength could be bolstered by the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

by Bobby Harrison, Mississippi Today June 12, 2023 Lawsuits alleging that Mississippi’s legislative and judicial districts dilute Black voter strength could be bolstered by a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling. In a surprise ruling last week, the nation’s highest court found that the seven U.S. House seats in Alabama were unconstitutional and violated the federal Voting Rights Act because they diluted Black voter strength.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

MSTODAYnews /  🏆 275. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Supreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationSupreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationThe dream of an America where all men and women were considered equal under the law has always been an unfinished masterpiece.
Baca lebih lajut »

Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingRepublicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingNAACP president Derrick Johnson welcomed the Supreme Court's decision as a 'triumph for our democracy.'
Baca lebih lajut »

Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActWhy the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court endorses race-based districtingSupreme Court endorses race-based districtingChief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.
Baca lebih lajut »

US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life​.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court Voting Rights Decision an Important, If Qualified, WinWhile Allen v. Milligan should be celebrated as a victory for fair representation, it cannot be an excuse for congressional inaction.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 12:34:10