Elizabeth Warren sounded an alarm about potential conflicts of interest in Environmental Protection Agency
"When individuals like Mr. Dunlap and Mr. Wehrum are put into positions that provide them with the power to influence environmental policies and impact the lives of millions of Americans, it is clear that this Administration cares more about serving the fossil fuel industry than it does about the health and wellbeing of the American people," Warren wrote.
Michigan, raising concerns that "despite Koch Industries extensive legal and financial interests in EPA decisions about PFAS chemicals, Mr. Dunlap is not prohibited from involvement in EPA PFAS policies that could have significant impacts on the company."By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Documents detail multimillion-dollar ties involving EPA official, secretive industry groupThe nation’s biggest coal-burning power companies paid a top lobbying firm millions of dollars to fight a wide range of Obama-era environmental rules — shortly before one of the firm’s partners became Trump’s top air pollution regulator
Baca lebih lajut »
Analysis | The Energy 202: Trump ethics' rules at issue in controversy over EPA official's meetingThe Energy 202: Trump ethics' rules at issue in controversy over EPA official's meeting
Baca lebih lajut »
EPA enforcement chief defends agency’s recordIt is “absolutely not true” that the agency is soft on polluters, says EPA’s enforcement chief Susan Bodine.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. EPA denies being soft on polluters as Democrats question enforcementThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's enforcement chief on Tuesday pus...
Baca lebih lajut »
Will An Appeals Court Make The EPA Ban A Pesticide Linked To Serious Health Risks?EPA scientists recommended a total ban on the pesticide chlorpyrifos. But in 2017, Trump's EPA administrator at the time decided against that. Now, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether to make the agency ban it.
Baca lebih lajut »