U.S. Supreme Court ruling may impact property rights in Alabama

Indonesia Berita Berita

U.S. Supreme Court ruling may impact property rights in Alabama
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 aldotcom
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 68%

Alabama lawsuits about who owns the ➡️extra proceeds⬅️ of property seized by county governments and sold for back taxes may be impacted by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of a Minnesota property owner facing a similar government seizure.

“What we’re focused on are persons or owners who were unable to redeem for one reason or another. They’re losing their property, or they’ve lost their property. They want to recover that surplus amount,” said Hereford.

The case involves a real estate developer, Shiloh Creek, LLC, that fell behind on $1,882.73 in taxes in 2010. In 2011, Shelby County sold the property at a tax sale, keeping an extra $24,000 of the total sale proceeds of $25,882.73. A few years later, in 2014, Shiloh Creek transferred its rights to redeem the property or claim the surplus sale amount to Jack Investment Partners LLC.

Both owners tried to get the excess sale proceeds returned to them, but the counties denied their requests. In 2018, a trial court ruled that the owners were not entitled to the money because of amendments from 2014 and 2017 to state law which required landowners to redeem property to get the excess proceeds returned to them.

According to Hereford, one aim of the existing suits filed by his firm is to create a process by which counties would be required to return surplus funds from tax delinquent sales to property owners, who are often living in poverty and are often elderly.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

aldotcom /  🏆 82. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Supreme Court weighs whether Alabama’s congressional map violates lawSupreme Court weighs whether Alabama’s congressional map violates lawA three-judge federal panel found last year that plaintiffs who challenged the map were likely to succeed on their claims that the plan is racially discriminatory because Black voters have less opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice.
Baca lebih lajut »

Extra Extra: The dirtiest water in New York CityExtra Extra: The dirtiest water in New York CityChris Christie is expected to to run for president again, so here are your evening links: — No, AOC did not tweet about having a crush on Elon Musk. — A Brooklyn fire station opted for a teacup pig instead of a firehouse dog — NYC's dirtiest beach + more
Baca lebih lajut »

Extra Extra: ‘Reclining Liberty’ is makin’ movesExtra Extra: ‘Reclining Liberty’ is makin’ movesA chill Statue of Liberty sculpture is moving here this summer, so here are your evening links: —Birth rates have been on a downward spiral lately —Bohemian Rhapsody was almost 'Mongolian Rhapsody' —NYC drivers won't have to slow down anytime soon + more!
Baca lebih lajut »

Alabama Death Row inmate's execution date set: First to get 30-hour time frameAlabama Death Row inmate's execution date set: First to get 30-hour time frameThis is the first time the state has followed the Alabama Supreme Court’s new procedure of allowing the governor to set a time frame for executions, rather than the court issuing an execution warrant for a single 24-hour period.
Baca lebih lajut »

Oklahoma Supreme Court overturns two abortion bansOklahoma Supreme Court overturns two abortion bansThe Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday morning struck down two state laws banning abortion, according to state news outlet The Oklahoman.
Baca lebih lajut »

US Supreme Court rulings darken forecast for EPA powersUS Supreme Court rulings darken forecast for EPA powersIn a span of 11 months, the U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a one-two punch against the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to combat air and water pollution in twin rulings that cloud future EPA regulatory moves, according to legal experts.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 16:56:19