Donald Trump is blasting special counsel Jack Smith and vowing to continue talking about his criminal cases even as prosecutors seek a protective order to limit the evidence that Trump and his team can share.
Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally, Tuesday Aug. 8, 2023, at Windham High School in Windham, N.H.
“I will talk about it. They’re not taking away my First Amendment,” Trump said, speaking to supporters during a rally at a high school in the southeastern New Hampshire town of Windham. that numerous federal and local election officials of both parties, a long list of courts, top former campaign staffers and even his attorney general have all said there is no evidence of the fraud he alleges.
Trump alluded to that Tuesday, predicting that when it comes to indictments, “I should have four by sometime next week." He also launched into a highly personal attack on Willis, who is Black, calling the 52-year-old prosecutor"a young woman, a young racist in Atlanta.”
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
What Jack Smith actually wants protected in citing Trump’s threatening postProsecutors seek to prevent the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials in the 2020 election case. Jack Smith's team cites Trump's threatening post, emphasizing the importance of the proposed order in protecting witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump claims Jack Smith's protective order would violate free speechFormer President Donald Trump rejects the proposed protective order by special counsel Jack Smith, arguing that it would infringe upon his freedom of speech. Trump suggests that Smith should be bound by a protective order instead, citing alleged illegal leaks by prosecutors.
Baca lebih lajut »
No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lostStrange as it may seem, why Trump allegedly committed these crimes is beside the point. Without ever showing that Trump knew he had lost the 2020 election. Yes, Smith did spill a good deal of ink including allegations that, if proven, would demonstrate that Trump was well aware that Biden had defeated him, and that his statements to the contrary were knowing lies. But those allegations merely help Smith tell us, and eventually a jury, a consistent story.
Baca lebih lajut »
Aileen Cannon asks Trump aide to explain Jack Smith's grand juryWalt Nauta, along with Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, was charged in the classified documents case for trying to obstruct the federal attempt to retrieve the classified material from Trump's Florida home.
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump rejects Jack Smith's protective order as 'overbroad,' violation of First AmendmentFormer President Donald Trump's attorneys oppose special counsel Jack Smith's proposal for a protective order in the case related to the 2020 election, claiming it is 'overbroad' and violates the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »
Jack Smith tears into Trump's protective order counterproposalThe Department of Justice swiftly responds to Trump's defense team's proposal to expand the protective order request in the January 6 case. Trump's lawyers argue that Smith's proposed protective order infringes on the former president's First Amendment rights and is too broad and restrictive. They counter the DOJ's call to prohibit the discussion of 'sensitive' evidence publicly.
Baca lebih lajut »