Trump’s legal team told a judge overseeing the election conspiracy case against him on Monday that prosecutors’ proposed protective order aimed at preventing the public disclosure of evidence is too broad and would restrict his First Amendment rights.
Donald
Prosecutors asked Friday for the protective order, which would impose rules on what Trump and his defense team can do with evidence shared by the government as they prepare for trial in the case unsealed last week. The former president’s legal team said his post was “generalized political speech” and had nothing to do with the case. A Trump spokesperson said last week that the post was in response to “dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs.”
Trump’s lawyers on Saturday had asked for an extra three days to respond to prosecutors’ request for the protective order, saying they needed more time for discussion. But Chutkan who was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama, swiftly denied that request. Prosecutors said Trump’s proposal aims to allow for the release of transcripts and audio recordings of witness interviews conducted outside the grand jury process.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Barr says Trump prosecution is 'legitimate case' and doesn't 'run afoul of the First Amendment'Former Attorney General WIlliam Barr dismissed the argument that the election interference case against former President Donald Trump is not valid because his statements were protected by the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump rejects Jack Smith's protective order as 'overbroad,' violation of First AmendmentFormer President Donald Trump's attorneys oppose special counsel Jack Smith's proposal for a protective order in the case related to the 2020 election, claiming it is 'overbroad' and violates the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »
Experts Dispute Trump Lawyer's Claim on First Amendment Rights in IndictmentDonald Trump’s lawyer, John Lauro, made the case for his client’s innocence on Sunday talk shows. Legal experts said his points about the First Amendment and “technical violations” of the Constitution sounded more like political arguments than legal ones.
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump lawyer’s claim on indictment and First Amendment rights questioned by expertsExperts have expressed doubts about former President Donald Trump's lawyer, John Lauro's claim that the indictment attacks First Amendment rights. They argue that false claims made for fraudulent purposes can be restricted by the government without violating the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »
Lawyers seek to limit Jan. 6 prosecutor’s bid for gag order on TrumpLawyers for former President Donald Trump have requested a federal judge to restrict a prosecutor's attempt to prevent Mr. Trump from publicly discussing evidence in the criminal case related to his efforts to challenge the outcome of the 2020 election. The Trump team argues that the request to silence the former president is too broad and would infringe upon his First Amendment rights. They also highlight that the prosecution is taking place during the 2024 presidential campaign, in which Mr. Trump is the leading candidate for the GOP.
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump Lawyers Argue Against Broad Protective Order in Election Conspiracy CaseDonald Trump's legal team has raised concerns about the proposed protective order in the election conspiracy case, stating that it is too broad and would infringe upon his First Amendment rights.
Baca lebih lajut »