The court has disposed of only 15 cases, with 44 cases yet to be decided before the usual conclusion of the term in June.
Nevertheless, the slow pace at which rulings have been issued this term has started to attract scrutiny from court watchers.
All of the court's major cases are yet to be decided, on issues like President Joe Biden's plan to forgive student loan debt, affirmative action in college admissions, voting rights and the knotty question of whether owners of creative businesses can refuse to work on same-sex weddings.The number of rulings so far this term is lower than it was on the same day in even the most recent terms, which also lagged behind the norm.
"I think the court is slower this year, but it has been pretty slow in recent years, too," said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law.Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a member of the court's 6-3 conservative majority, downplayed the delay in issuing decisions in January, saying at a public event that the court was "off and running" and that he was confident all the rulings would be issued by the end of June.
The court usually decides the easier cases first, those in which no justices dissent, but this term, of the 14 cases the court has issued full rulings on, only eight have been unanimous. The court was divided 5-4 in two cases and 6-3 in three others. The court dismissed one case without issuing a written ruling.
Court experts differed on whether the crunch would have any impact on how the court actually decides cases. It could lead to shorter rulings, fewer separate concurring or dissenting opinions, or even narrower decisions in which the court avoids broad pronouncements on the law.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court's Alito says abortion leak meant to intimidate court, Wall Street Journal reportsU.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito believes the leak last May of a draft opinion that ended the nationwide right to abortion was meant to 'intimidate' the court into changing its decision, the conservative justice told the Wall Street Journal.
Baca lebih lajut »
Justice with Jessica: Lower-cost help approved by Colorado Supreme Court for family law casesThe Colorado Supreme Court recently approved a program intended to make access to legal help more affordable for people with family law issues.
Baca lebih lajut »
North Carolina Supreme Court sides with GOP lawmakers in congressional map disputeThe North Carolina Supreme Court overruled a prior decision Friday that had implemented a court-drawn congressional map over one designed by Republican lawmakers.
Baca lebih lajut »
North Carolina Supreme Court reverses redistricting ruling in a win for RepublicansA new majority on the North Carolina Supreme Court on Friday gave Republican lawmakers free rein to draw congressional maps as they see fit, reversing a decision issued in December when liberals controlled the court.
Baca lebih lajut »
North Carolina Supreme Court hands GOP big win with election rulingsThe justices threw out a previous ruling against gerrymandered voting maps and upheld a photo voter identification law that colleagues had struck down as racially biased.
Baca lebih lajut »
Senators Are Pushing to Install Cameras Inside the Supreme CourtTwo U.S. Senators are pushing to permit the use of cameras inside federal courts as well as in the Supreme Court.
Baca lebih lajut »