The Supreme Court is taking up a new congressional redistricting case, this time from South Carolina, that could shape the fight for partisan control of the House of Representatives
. Arguments taking place at the high court on Wednesday will focus on a coastal district that is held by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace. In January, a lower court ordered the district redrawn after finding that Republicans who control the state Legislature improperly moved Democratic-leaning Black voters into another district to make the seat safer for Mace in 2022. When Mace first won election in 2020, she edged Democratic incumbent Rep. Joe Cunningham by 1%, under 5,400 votes.
The state's new map will give Alabama two congressional districts where Black voters comprise a substantial portion of the electorate. A similar pending Louisiana case could lead to a second mostly Black district there, too. In South Carolina, Black voters wouldn’t be as numerous in a redrawn district. But combined with a substantial set of Democratic-leaning white voters, Democrats could be competitive in the reconfigured district.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering disputeThe Supreme Court will consider whether the lines of South Carolina's Congressional District 1 are an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Baca lebih lajut »
South Carolina Democrat's House bid runs through US Supreme CourtSouth Carolina Democrat Michael B. Moore, the great- great-grandson of a Black Civil War hero and pioneering 19th century congressman, is aiming to help his party retake control of the U.S. House of Representatives from Republicans in 2024.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court could drop California's shield for doctors who mail abortion pillsCalifornia's new law protecting in-state doctors and pharmacists who prescribe and provide the abortion pill to out-of-state patients could be upended by the Supreme Court if the justices choose to review the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone.
Baca lebih lajut »
How the 19th Century Supreme Court Set Us on a Path to AuthoritarianismIn 1883, the Supreme Court refused to do away with racial segregation. And that’s helped set the stage for today’s massive resistance to multiracial power.
Baca lebih lajut »
The 'soft dictatorship' of this Supreme CourtWith the nine justices reconvened for the fall term, SFGATE columnist Drew Magary is here to remind us all to stay angry and demand change.
Baca lebih lajut »
The Supreme Court Should Rein In the Administrative State in CFPB Case | OpinionIf ever there was a poster child for the progressive vision of an unaccountable administrative state, it's the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Baca lebih lajut »