The Supreme Court weakened the EPA's power to fight climate change -- but demand for clean energy is going strong

Indonesia Berita Berita

The Supreme Court weakened the EPA's power to fight climate change -- but demand for clean energy is going strong
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 MarketWatch
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 97%

OPINION: The transition to clean energy is happening, and we can and must speed it up with good policy. The EPA lost one effective tool as a result of the Court ruling, but hope is not lost.

In 2021, more than 40% of Americans lived in a county that was hit by extreme weather connected to climate change, according to a Washington Post analysis of federal disaster declarations. Without immediate action to reduce global carbon emissions, we face an even more dire future.

Obama’s clean power rules never took effect after fossil fuel-producing states sued the EPA and the Supreme Court delayed implementation. Before that case was resolved, then-President Donald Trump’s administration scrapped the Clean Power Plan entirely and in 2019 replaced it with the Affordable Clean Energy rule. ACE was purportedly designed to reduce emissions, but actually created incentives to burn more fossil fuels. In 2021, the U.S.

Following the ruling, there is no question that the agency’s tools to address climate emissions from power plants are significantly more restricted. But there are potential legislative solutions — and other fixes are happening on their own.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

MarketWatch /  🏆 3. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

How the Supreme Court Has Denigrated Its Own LegitimacyHow the Supreme Court Has Denigrated Its Own Legitimacy“We don't have to live in this system just because the court says so.”
Baca lebih lajut »

Opinion | Right-Wing Zealots on the Supreme Court Threaten to Make American Theocracy a RealityOpinion | Right-Wing Zealots on the Supreme Court Threaten to Make American Theocracy a Reality'We must expand the Supreme Court. If we don't, six extremist judges will continue to overturn the will of voters and destroy our rights.'
Baca lebih lajut »

Op-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rightsOp-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rights'Reconstruction teaches us that when extremist movements tell you where they are headed, you should believe them. America should not go backwards on rights yet again,' writes Christopher M. Richardson, a former U.S. diplomat. (via latimesopinion)
Baca lebih lajut »

Former Supreme Court Justice Steven Breyer joins Harvard as professorFormer Supreme Court Justice Steven Breyer joins Harvard as professorRetired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is joining Harvard's faculty as a professor, the university announced Friday.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court Shouldn’t Be Able to Rule on Abortion, Ocasio-Cortez Says in New PushSupreme Court Shouldn’t Be Able to Rule on Abortion, Ocasio-Cortez Says in New PushAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez is pushing to strip the Supreme Court of its ability to rule on abortion altogether — as well as marriage equality, sex and contraception.
Baca lebih lajut »

This sleeper Supreme Court case could be a nightmare for corporationsThis sleeper Supreme Court case could be a nightmare for corporationsA little-noticed U.S. Supreme Court case involving a Virginia railroad worker’s Pennsylvania state court suit against his onetime employer could drastically expand plaintiffs’ ability to sue corporations in states where businesses are neither headquartered nor incorporated.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 17:52:06