This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases, Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, which discussed the liability of social media companies when their platforms are used by terrorist groups.
And I'm Micah Loewinger. This week, the high court pondered the fate of Silicon Valley.Could change the Internet as we know it.It's just uncharted territory. I mean, what would happen if you opened up the companies to that kind of liability?The justices heard oral arguments for two cases, both concerning social media and terrorism and the future of speech and business on the Internet. On Wednesday, they heard Twitter v. Taamneh, a case which stems from a 2017 ISIS attack in Turkey.
And the family of one of the victims of the shooting sued Twitter and other social media companies saying that they had turned a blind eye while ISIS took their platforms and radicalized people around the world.You have to prove Twitter has had substantial knowledge that Islamic State material was on their platform. And then you need to draw a line between that material and the actual act of terrorism.
Blatt painted a catastrophic picture of what would happen to the Web without Section 230, where sites would either give up on content moderation.And you basically have the Internet of filth, violence, hate speech and everything else that's not attractive.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court rules in MoneyGram case; first majority opinion by Justice JacksonThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of states that say financial instruments that are abandoned should go to the states where they were purchased, not to where the company that sold them is located.
Baca lebih lajut »
How a Supreme Court justice's paragraph put the Voting Rights Act in more dangerJustice Neil Gorsuch tacked on a handful of sentences to a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, planting the seeds of a legal fight that could further weaken Voting Rights Act protections for people of color.
Baca lebih lajut »
How a Supreme Court justice's paragraph put the Voting Rights Act in more dangerJustice Neil Gorsuch tacked on a handful of sentences to a 2021 Supreme Court ruling, planting the seeds of a legal fight that could further weaken Voting Rights Act protections for people of color.
Baca lebih lajut »
These Supreme Court Cases Could End Affirmative Action at CollegesHere’s what that would look like:
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court student loan case: The arguments explainedThe Supreme Court is about to hear arguments over President Joe Biden’s student debt relief plan
Baca lebih lajut »