If there wasn’t so much else swirling around our elections and democracy right now, this case would be commanding everyone’s attention.
On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a pair of cases out of Texas and Florida that could force major social media platforms to carry posts from Donald Trump or others who lie about elections being stolen or obliquely encourage election-related violence. A ruling in favor of these states would turn the First Amendment upside down and create the conditions for undermining American democracy.
In response to the removal of Trump and concern over what they call “censorship” of conservatives, Florida and Texas each passed laws that make content moderation difficult if not impossible for major social media companies. The laws differ in some particulars, but both would make it illegal to remove the kinds of content we saw from Trump before he was deplatformed in 2020.
In so doing, the platforms participated in the open marketplace of ideas by exercising their sound editorial judgment in a socially responsible way to protect democracy. Even if certain moderation decisions were imperfect in hindsight, the platforms’ efforts were vastly preferable to an alternative in which government fiat deprives platforms of the power to remove even dangerous speech.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
What’s next in Trump’s immunity fight after his Supreme Court filingLaura Jarrett is a senior legal correspondent for NBC News.
Baca lebih lajut »
Experts expect California's background checks for ammunition law to go to US Supreme CourtThe battle over gun and ammunition regulation in California is escalating.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Puts Trump Case On Pause—For At Least A Week—For DOJ ResponseI am a senior reporter based in London covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues including the Supreme Court and litigation against Donald Trump. I previously covered politics and news for Vanity Fair and Mic, and as a theater critic I served as a member of the New York Outer Critics Circle.
Baca lebih lajut »
The Supreme Court gives Jack Smith a week to respond on Trump immunityJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Baca lebih lajut »
Whatever the Supreme Court decides, California can’t keep criminalizing homelessnessMuch is at stake with the U.S. Supreme Court agreeing to hear a case that determines how and when California cities can clear homeless camps.
Baca lebih lajut »
Jack Smith tells Supreme Court to keep Trump criminal trial on trackSpecial counsel Jack Smith responded Wednesday to former President Donald Trump's bid to halt criminal proceedings against him while seeking to undo an appeals court decision that found he lacked presidential immunity, saying the Supreme Court must deny Trump's efforts.
Baca lebih lajut »