The Supreme Court ruled that the EPA can't regulate power plant emissions – despite the industry being one of the largest sources of greenhouse gases. 'We are allowing for a free-for-all,' swetac of WeDontHaveTime said. 'And it couldn't be a worse time'
are often located in these areas, polluting the air and causing health problems for people who live nearby.
"These districts that have been redlined, on average, experience higher temperatures by a few degrees to five or six degrees than their more affluent communities. And that is dangerous for human health," she said."...These communities will continue to suffer. We are seeing a continued legacy of environmental racism with the Supreme Court decision."
Housing segregation and redlining has resulted in communities with majority Black and Brown populations suffering from flooding and other weather- and health-related issues. Without adequate steps to reduce rising temperatures, those problems will only heighten. "Self-regulation doesn't exist in the fossil fuel industry," she said."...I think it's very clear that the primary motivation for oil and gas executives is to continue to line their pockets to continue to get the support of shareholders so that conservatives in Congress can put forward legislation that continues to allow for oil and gas drilling."
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court And Carbon Regulation: West Virginia V. EPA Requires Rethinking Climate ActivismEvery crisis creates new opportunities. West Virginia v. EPA should motivate the climate movement to secure a popular mandate for federal carbon regulations in the 2022 midterm elections. The movement should seek support for utility-scale solar and wind and revisit nuclear energy and carbon capture.
Baca lebih lajut »
EPA extends comment period on watershed protections that would block Pebble MineThe Environmental Protection Agency announced last week that it's extending its comment period for proposed restrictions on mining of the Pebble deposit. Mining opponents have said they want the process to wrap up as quickly as possible.
Baca lebih lajut »
In light of EPA court ruling, new focus on states' powerThe Supreme Court decision June 30 restricting the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency may mean continued pollution from power plants in states that are not switching to cleaner energy.
Baca lebih lajut »
West Virginia Vs EPA Doesn't Have To Hurt The Environment (Part 2)In Part 1, I explained an alternative approach to looking at Supreme Court cases that don't go your way. Rather than just be angry and go protest, it's always a good idea to read the
Baca lebih lajut »
EPA Likely Underestimating Amount of Toxic Forever Chemicals in US Water: Analysis'The EPA is doing the bare minimum it can and that's putting people's health at risk,' said bennettpeer, the policy director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
Baca lebih lajut »
Opinion | The Supreme Court's Anti-Climate Decision in West Virginia v. EPA Impacts All of Us'Make no mistake: climate change is a public health emergency.'
Baca lebih lajut »