The Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday over a California animal cruelty law that could raise the cost of bacon and other pork products nationwide
will hear arguments over a California animal cruelty law that could raise the cost of bacon and other pork products nationwide.
The case before the court on Tuesday involves California's Proposition 12, which voters passed in 2018. It said that pork sold in the state needs to come from pigs whose mothers were raised with at least 24 square feet of space, including the ability to lie down and turn around. That rules out the confined “gestation crates," metal enclosures that are common in the pork industry.
The question for the high court is whether California has impermissibly burdened the pork market and improperly regulated an industry outside its borders. They also say that the way the pork market works, with cuts of meat from various producers being combined before sale, it's likely all pork would have to meet California standards, regardless of where it's sold. Complying with Proposition 12 could cost the industry $290 million to $350 million, they say.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Pork industry challenging California animal welfare law before Supreme Court TuesdayOral arguments in the case, National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, will be heard on Tuesday. Professor Glenn Smith, who teaches constitutional law at California Western School of Law, joined Midday Edition on Monday to preview the case.
Baca lebih lajut »
Pork industry takes fight over California law to U.S. Supreme CourtThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on Tuesday in an industry challenge to the constitutionality of a California animal welfare law in a case that could undermine the power of states to regulate a range of issues within their own borders.
Baca lebih lajut »
Endorsement: Retain Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Supreme Court and appeals justicesEndorsement: Retain Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Supreme Court and appeals justices (via latimesopinion)
Baca lebih lajut »
Ketanji Brown Jackson invokes 14th Amendment history during Supreme Court voting rights hearing
Baca lebih lajut »
KBJ's case for 'progressive originalism' in Supreme Court debut draws rebukeSupreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argues the framers of the 14th Amendment adopted it 'in a race-conscious way,' a position some legal experts say is subject to debate.
Baca lebih lajut »