The Supreme Court said it would decide on the constitutionality of the CFPB, which is funded by the Federal Reserve and not Congress.
The Supreme Court said Monday it would decide on the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created in the wake of the 2008 Wall Street collapse and funded directly by the Federal Reserve.
If the high court’s conservative majority agrees, it could cast doubt on the Federal Reserve as well because the Fed relies on bank fees and interest income for its operating expenses, not an annual appropriation from Congress. The CFPB was championed by Democrats, including now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren, to protect consumers and borrowers from deceptive and unfair practices by banks and mortgage lenders. It has been steadily opposed by much of the lending industry and many Republicans.
The Democrats who wrote the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 tried to protect the bureau from political interference from the White House or Congress. The director was given a semi-independent status, and the bureau was authorized to obtain up to 12% of the annual revenues of the Federal Reserve for its operating expenses.The Supreme Court’s conservatives have cast a skeptical eye on the bureau.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court takes up challenge to consumer protection agency’s fundingSupreme Court agrees to resolve a legal challenge brought by business groups that claim that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s decisions should be voided because Congress does not directly fund it.
Baca lebih lajut »
Company that lost to mini-casino developer appeals to Pa. Supreme CourtThe project is planned for the former Macy's store at Nittany Mall, but there are questions over the winning bidder's qualifications.
Baca lebih lajut »
What you need to know as student-debt relief goes to the Supreme CourtBiden's student-loan forgiveness is about to have its day at the Supreme Court. Here's everything you need to know.
Baca lebih lajut »
How the Supreme Court could reshape the internet as you know it'Would Google collapse, and the internet be destroyed,' Justice Alito asked a Google attorney on Tuesday, 'if YouTube and therefore Google were potentially liable' for the content its users posted?
Baca lebih lajut »
How the Supreme Court could reshape the internet as you know it'Would Google collapse, and the internet be destroyed,' Justice Alito asked a Google attorney on Tuesday, 'if YouTube and therefore Google were potentially liable' for the content its users posted?
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Justice Thomas Moore Has Personal Experience With Student LoansThe Supreme Court won’t have far to look for a personal take on the “crushing weight” of student debt that underlies the Biden administration’s college loan forgiveness plan.
Baca lebih lajut »