Supreme Court should protect domestic violence victims from guns, even if the founders didn't

Indonesia Berita Berita

Supreme Court should protect domestic violence victims from guns, even if the founders didn't
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 82%

The upcoming case United States vs. Rahimi gives the justices a chance to correct a contorted approach to the 2nd Amendment — and save lives.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday in a case that puts the lives of thousands of women in jeopardy. In United States vs. Rahimi, the court will decide the constitutionality of a federal law that prohibits gun possession by people who are subject to domestic violence protective orders. Every month, 70 women are shot and killed by an intimate partner. An October 2022 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that more than 12 million adults in the U.S.

The first cartridge revolver wasn’t introduced until 1871. Only then could domestic abusers easily and quickly use a gun. The Supreme Court has held that the 2nd Amendment’s definition of “arms” is not limited to guns in existence at the time the Constitution was written, but also includes entirely new weapons, like stun guns. That idea has a logical corollary: When new gun technology creates a new problem, legislatures must be allowed to adopt new solutions.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

latimes /  🏆 11. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Supreme Court justices ponder Trump’s hand sizeSupreme Court justices ponder Trump’s hand sizeJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Baca lebih lajut »

Gun Fight at Supreme Court: Free Speech for NRA and ATF Says Bump Stocks Are MachinegunsGun Fight at Supreme Court: Free Speech for NRA and ATF Says Bump Stocks Are MachinegunsSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court weighs Second Amendment rights for domestic violence offendersSupreme Court weighs Second Amendment rights for domestic violence offendersKaelan Deese is a Supreme Court reporter for the Washington Examiner covering the latest happenings at the nation's highest court and the legal issues surrounding Second Amendment rights, abortion, and religious liberties. He previously wrote breaking news as a fellow for the Hill during the 2020 election cycle.
Baca lebih lajut »

14th Amendment challenges to Trump's candidacy are likely Supreme Court bound14th Amendment challenges to Trump's candidacy are likely Supreme Court boundThere's a 'very good chance' a lower court rules against Trump, a lawyer says.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court agrees to look at legality of Trump-era bump stock banSupreme Court agrees to look at legality of Trump-era bump stock banRapid-fire gun bump stocks were used in the Las Vegas mass shooting.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 21:33:28