Conservative and liberal justices grappled with the historic significance of the case, which will impact presidential power and Donald Trump’s D.C. trial.
Demonstrators dressed as kangaroos protest outside of the United States Supreme Court as the court hears the case regarding if Donald Trump is immune from prosecution for actions he took while in office on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on April 25, 2024.
immunity for their official acts. Instead, a majority of justices seemed to be looking for a way to provide more narrow protections for a president’s core constitutional dutieswith some of the conservative justices especially concerned about hampering the power of future presidents. Most of the justices — and even the lawyers on opposite sides in the case — seemed to agree that a former president can be prosecuted for private conduct while in office.
That means the high court’s ruling is likely to require lower courts to separate out Trump’s official acts from his private onesas alleged in the indictment, before proceedings can restart in the election obstruction case. If the D.C. to concede that many of the alleged acts amount to private conduct that would not be shielded from prosecution.
D.C. Circuit opinion, which he characterized as saying in essence that “a former president can be prosecuted because he’s being prosecuted.” He said such circular reasoning “concerns me” in part because it relies only on a prosecutor acting in good faith with no other protections for the office of the presidency.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Live updates: Supreme Court arguments in Jan. 6 case that may impact Trump trial, riotersThe Supreme Court will hear arguments over a law used to charge hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters and levied against Donald Trump in his federal election obstruction case.
Baca lebih lajut »
How the Supreme Court stepping into the Trump immunity fray could affect a Jan. 6 trialExperts say a ruling's timing is a key factor in when, or if, he stands trial.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court considers scope of federal obstruction law used to prosecute Trump and Jan. 6 riotersThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case challenging the scope of a federal obstruction statute that federal prosecutors have used to charge more than 300 Jan. 6 defendants.
Baca lebih lajut »
How a Jan. 6 case at the Supreme Court could affect Trump’s election interference caseJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court grapples with obstruction charge for 350 Jan. 6 defendants, including Donald TrumpThe Supreme Court struggled Tuesday with the government's case against 350 Jan. 6 defendants from the 2021 protest at the Capitol, with justices pondering how a law written in the wake of the Enron document-shredding scandal can be applied to those who brought the 2020 election certification to a halt.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court appears divided over obstruction law used to prosecute Trump, Jan. 6 riotersThe Supreme Court seemed divided over a case challenging the scope of a federal obstruction law that prosecutors have used to charge more than 300 Jan. 6 defendants.
Baca lebih lajut »