The court said the government could not reject a trademark claim because it viewed the words or messages as “scandalous.”
Los Angeles artist Erik Brunetti, the founder of the streetwear clothing company FUCT, in Los Angeles on April 11.
The court by 6-3 vote struck down part of the 1946 trademark act and said the government could not reject a brand name because it viewed the words or messages as “scandalous” or “immoral.” The ruling is a victory for Erik Brunetti, who has been selling his hats and T-shirts since 1991. And it continues a trend in which the high court looks skeptically at laws that act to regulate the freedom of expression.and struck down the part of the trademark law that prohibited the use of “disparaging” words.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court rules for black death row inmate over prosecutor's racial biasUS Supreme Court has reversed the conviction of a Mississippi death row inmate who said the state prosecutor repeatedly kicked black people off the jury each time he was tried for the same murders.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court rules against newspaper seeking access to food stamp dataThe ruling deals a blow to open-government advocates but is a boon to industry trade groups.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court sides with designer over allegedly offensive trademarkNEW: Supreme Court sides with designer who sought to trademark allegedly offensive term but was blocked by a federal law prohibiting registration of 'immoral or scandalous' ideas.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare cases with billions of dollars at stakeThe Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge from health insurers who argue the federal government owes them hefty Obamacare payments
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court bolsters rights for developers and property owners in California and elsewhereThe Supreme Court’s conservative majority gave a major boost to property rights, ruling that developers and landowners may go directly to federal court and seek compensation for a “taking” of their property.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. Supreme Court strikes down stiff firearms penaltiesConservative Justice Neil Gorsuch sided with the U.S. Supreme Court&39;s four liberal members on Monday in striking down as unconstitutionally vague a law imposing stiff criminal sentences for people convicted of certain crimes involving firearms. In the 5-4 ruling, with Gorsuch&39;s fellow conservatives
Baca lebih lajut »