The case concerned whether a union could face damages when wet concrete loaded onto trucks was allegedly rendered useless after workers walked off the job.
Stefani Reynolds | AFP | Getty Imageson Thursday ruled in favor of a concrete company in Washington state seeking to revive a lawsuit against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters alleging that a strike damaged its product.
Barrett, one of the court's six conservatives, wrote that a state court was wrong to dismiss the claims at such an early stage in proceedings based on its concern that the claims conflicted with the National Labor Relations Act , a federal law that protects union activity. Organized labor advocates had raised concern that a ruling in favor of the company could stifle strike actions by putting unions on the hook for a broad range of potential losses employers can face a result of such activities.
Jackson pointed to the fact that the National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint after the state court ruling, charging the company with unfair labor practices and saying that the drivers' actions were "arguably protected."
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
It Took Alito Barely a Month to Violate the Supreme Court’s New Ethics RulesThe justices who commit the most ethics violations are also the least likely to follow voluntary ethics guidelines.
Baca lebih lajut »
COVID-19 pandemic doesn’t trigger property tax break, Colorado Supreme Court rulesThe justices found that the COVID-19 pandemic was not an “act of nature” that would allow property owners to seek re-assessment of their property values outside of the normal two-year property tax assessment cycle,
Baca lebih lajut »
Oklahoma Supreme Court rules 2 abortion bans unconstitutional, but abortion is still illegal in most casesThe high court said the two bans are unconstitutional because they require a 'medical emergency' before a doctor can perform an abortion -- language that conflicts with a previous ruling.
Baca lebih lajut »
Alaska Supreme Court finds former North Pole refinery owner liable for pollutionThe former owner of a North Pole petroleum refinery is financially liable for groundwater pollution that has contaminated drinking-water wells around the refinery, the Alaska Supreme Court said in a ruling published Friday.
Baca lebih lajut »
Opinion: The Supreme Court was enabling corruption well before the Clarence Thomas scandalJohn Roberts' court has undone campaign finance safeguards and overturned convictions of public officials for years, most recently that of a onetime aide to Andrew Cuomo.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court rejects lawsuit that sought to hold Reddit responsible for hosting child pornography | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up a case from a victim of sex trafficking who sought to hold Reddit, an online platform, responsible for hosting images of child pornography on the website.
Baca lebih lajut »