The Supreme Court put another dent in the regulatory reach of the EPA, ruling in favor of an Idaho couple in their long-running bid to build a home on property that the EPA had deemed a protected wetland under a landmark federal anti-pollution law.
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday put another dent in the regulatory reach of the Environmental Protection Agency, ruling in favor of an Idaho couple in their long-running bid to build a home on property that the EPA had deemed a protected wetland under a landmark federal anti-pollution law.
The case decided on Thursday stemmed from the Sacketts' purchase in 2004 of an undeveloped plot of land about 300 feet from Priest Lake, one of the largest lakes in Idaho, near the U.S.-Canada border. In 2007, the couple began preparing construction of a home on it. Courts and regulators have been grappling for decades over how much of a connection with a waterway a property must have in order to require a permit, with the Supreme Court issuing a ruling in 2006 that led to further uncertainty.
Bethsaida Sigaran, left, of Baltimore, her brother Jaime Sigaran, with American Rivers, and Thea Louis, with Clean Water Action, join supporters of the Clean Water Act as they demonstrate outside the Supreme Court, Oct. 3, 2022, in Washington, as the court began arguments in Sackett v. EPA.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court weakens EPA power to enforce Clean Water ActBreaking news: The Supreme Court on Thursday cut back the power of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate the nation’s wetlands and waterways, another setback for the agency’s authority to combat pollution.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. Supreme Court rules against EPA in wetlands regulation challengeThe U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday put another dent in the regulatory reach of the Environmental Protection Agency, ruling in favor of an Idaho couple in their long-running bid to build a home on property that the EPA had deemed a protected wetland under a landmark federal anti-pollution law.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court limits EPA's authority over wetlands, boosts property rights over clean waterThe Supreme Court on Thursday made it harder for the federal government to police water pollution in a decision that strips protections from wetlands that are isolated from larger bodies of water.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court rules against EPA in dispute over regulating wetlandsThe Supreme Court ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency in a dispute over its authority to regulate certain wetlands under the Clean Water Act.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court cuts EPA's Clean Water Act protection for wetlandsThe Supreme Court significantly rolled back federal safeguards for wetlands under the Clean Water Act, siding with Idaho property owners in a decision that curbs EPA power.
Baca lebih lajut »
Schumer rips 'MAGA' Supreme Court after 9-0 vote on EPA waters ruleSenate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Thursday slammed a Supreme Court decision limiting the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate waters of the U.S.
Baca lebih lajut »