The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against North Carolina lawmakers, rejecting the 'independent state legislature' theory. See potential bias and similarities in coverage from axios, SCOTUSblog and FoxNews: SupremeCourt Elections
against North Carolina lawmakers, who argued the U.S. Constitution exempted state legislatures from judicial review in election cases. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said the Constitution’s Elections Clause “does not insulate state legislatures from the ordinary exercise of state judicial review.” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, saying the ruling unnecessarily committed the Federal Judiciary to an “uncertain path.
”The “independent state legislature” theory has been used in legal arguments to defend purportedly gerrymandered congressional districts and to oppose state court rulings on absentee ballot policies during the 2020 election. If the Supreme Court had accepted it, it could have allowed state legislatures to pass election policies with little oversight from courts.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court ruling limits challenges to unlawful convictions for innocent federal prisoners - New York Amsterdam NewsIn a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court delivered a blow to the rights of federal prisoners, particularly those who may be completely innocent.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court news: Justice Alito targeted in a string of reports raising ethical concernsSupreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was the target of new reports raising ethical concerns about his spouse's fossil fuel lease and his close connections at a top law firm with interests in an undecided case before the court.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court news: Colorado stalker's conviction vacated in 'true threats' caseThe Supreme Court vacated a Colorado man's stalking conviction on Tuesday in a 7-2 ruling that sets new guidelines on how online harassment can be protected under the First Amendment if not a 'true threat.'
Baca lebih lajut »
Affirmative action Supreme Court decision: New Yahoo News poll sheds light on where Americans standAhead of a major Supreme Court decision this week on affirmative action policies at American universities, a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll found modest support for the use of race and ethnicity in deciding college admissions.
Baca lebih lajut »
Affirmative action Supreme Court decision: New Yahoo News poll sheds light on where Americans standA new Yahoo News/YouGov survey shows that opinions are mixed about race-based criteria for college admissions, ahead of a decision from the Supreme Court this week.
Baca lebih lajut »
Expert says Utah wetlands are in danger following recent Supreme Court decisionIn late May, the court ruled that wetlands can only be regulated under the Clean Water Act if they have a 'continuous surface connection' to larger, regulated bodies of water.
Baca lebih lajut »