Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to House proxy voting

Indonesia Berita Berita

Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to House proxy voting
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 axios
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 32 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 16%
  • Publisher: 63%

NEW: The Supreme Court has declined to hear Kevin McCarthy's lawsuit challenging voting by proxy in the House — which many lawmakers see as critical to minimizing coronavirus spread in Congress.

The decision leaves in place a way to vote on legislation that many lawmakers see as critical to minimizing the spread of coronavirus in Congress – and one that even critics have taken advantage of.

The House, where the rules are decided by the controlling party — in this case Democrats, recently took to combat the virus amid the Omicron surge, including placing restrictions on congregating in the chamber.that the House's internal decision-making is not subject to judicial review under the Constitution's Speech or Debate clause.

The lawsuit argued proxy voting rules are unconstitutional because the Constitution requires the House to have a physical quorum to conduct business.Roughly 80% of members, including many Republicans who signed onto the lawsuit, have used proxy voting as of December,

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

axios /  🏆 302. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Jan. 6 panel obtains Trump White House records after Supreme Court rulingJan. 6 panel obtains Trump White House records after Supreme Court rulingThe National Archives and Records Administration has provided a House committee with more than 700 pages of presidential documents.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court won’t speed challenge to Texas abortion limitsSupreme Court won’t speed challenge to Texas abortion limitsOver dissents from the three liberal justices, the court declined to order a federal appeals court to return the case to a federal judge who had temporarily blocked the law’s enforcement. The court offered no explanation for its action.
Baca lebih lajut »

Opinion | How the Supreme Court mask controversy is missing the pointOpinion | How the Supreme Court mask controversy is missing the pointSteven Lubet: The focus on whether Justice Gorsuch was or wasn’t asked to wear a face covering misses the point: He shouldn’t have had to be asked in the first place. - NBCNewsTHINK
Baca lebih lajut »

University Hospitals reinstates vaccine requirement for caregivers after Supreme Court rulingUniversity Hospitals reinstates vaccine requirement for caregivers after Supreme Court ruling'Since the vaccine became available in late 2020, we have encouraged our caregivers to get vaccinated and made vaccines readily available to them.'
Baca lebih lajut »

Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?“Ginni Thomas is behaving horribly, and she’s hurt the Supreme Court and the administration of justice,” the judicial ethicist Stephen Gillers said. “If you could take a secret poll of the other eight Justices, I have no doubt that they are appalled.”
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court takes cases on future of affirmative actionSupreme Court takes cases on future of affirmative actionJUST IN: The U.S. Supreme Court says it will take up a pair of cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-04-05 01:09:55