BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court preserved the system that gives preference to Native American families in foster care and adoption proceedings of Native children, rejecting a broad attack from Republican-led states and white families.
The court left in place the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which was enacted to address concerns that Native children were being separated from their families and, too frequently, placed in non-Native homes.
Demonstrators stand outside of the U.S. Supreme Court, as the court hears arguments over the Indian Child Welfare Act on Nov. 9, 2022, in Washington. The court left in place the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, which was enacted to address concerns that Native children were being separated from their families and, too frequently, placed in non-Native homes.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Native American child welfare lawThe Supreme Court has preserved the system that gives preference to Native American families in foster care and adoption proceedings of Native children
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court delivers win for Native American families in adoption caseBREAKING: Supreme Court delivers win for Native American families in adoption case. The ruling says the law that gives preference to Native Americans in the adoption process does not discriminate on the basis of race, as challengers argued.
Baca lebih lajut »
Students dig to learn about ancient Native American village in ProvoAfter almost a month of digging and excavating, local anthropology college students are wrapping up their archaeological dig of a Native American village that existed in Provo long ago.
Baca lebih lajut »
Where Texas redistricting lawsuits stand after U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Alabama caseThe high court left intact a key provision of the federal Voting Rights Act in a case many feared would go the other way. The decision’s importance in ongoing litigation over Texas’ political maps will largely be felt in what didn’t happen.
Baca lebih lajut »
Federal judges to discuss Alabama’s congressional map after Supreme Court rulingThe three-judge panel of judges overseeing a lawsuit over Alabama’s congressional map have scheduled a status conference for Friday, after the U.S. Supreme Court sided with their initial ruling that the maps may violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court: Ohio ballot board must fix language describing August supermajority questionThe Ohio Supreme Court on Monday ordered a state panel back to work to fix language describing an August ballot proposal aimed at making it harder to amend the state’s constitution, after justices determined elements of the wording would mislead voters.
Baca lebih lajut »