The battle appears to be over, at least until 2025 or so.
in favor of a six-year licensing agreement but allowed a case in front of the Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board to continue. There, Apple argued the two patents should be invalid, but the board ruled in Qualcomm’s favor.
Last April, the Federal Circuit court rejected Apple’s request for an appeal based on the 2019 settlement covering thousands of patents, including those two. At the time, Apple argued that its royalty payments and risk of being sued again were reasons for a hearing.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
The Supreme Court won't hear the Apple-Qualcomm patent case | EngadgetThe Supreme Court has denied Apple's effort to invalidate two Qualcomm patents from that played a role in the companies' 2019 legal battle..
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court blocks Apple bid to invalidate Qualcomm patentsThe Supreme Court is blocking Apple from trying to cancel patents that were awarded to two Qualcomm products.
Baca lebih lajut »
'This court has lost legitimacy': Warren calls for Supreme Court expansionElizabeth Warren calls for Supreme Court expansion: 'This court has lost legitimacy. ... They just took the last of it and set a torch to it with the Roe v. Wade opinion.'
Baca lebih lajut »
Opinion | The Supreme Court just brought a bayonet to an AR-15 fightThe court’s decision means we do not take current circumstances into account when analyzing gun control measures.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. Supreme Court rules school district cannot prohibit high school football coach’s prayers on fieldThe Supreme Court said Monday that a Washington state school district violated the First Amendment rights of a high school football coach when he lost his job for praying at the 50-yard line after …
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Sides With HS Coach Who Sought to Pray After GamesThe case forced the justices to wrestle with how to balance the religious and free speech rights of teachers and coaches with the rights of students not to feel pressured into participating in religious practices
Baca lebih lajut »