BREAKING NEWS. - Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissions - KPRC2 SCOTUS
FILE - Steam billows from a coal-fired power plant Nov. 18, 2021, in Craig, Colo. The Supreme Court on Thursday, June 30, 2022, limited how the nations main anti-air pollution law can be used to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. By a 6-3 vote, with conservatives in the majority, the court said that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.
"A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,” he wrote. The power plant case has a long and complicated history that begins with the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. That plan would have required states to reduce emissions from the generation of electricity, mainly by shifting away from coal-fired plants.
Adding to the unusual nature of the high court’s involvement, the reductions sought in the Obama plan by 2030 already have been achieved through the market-driven closure of hundreds of coal plants.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over tribes in win for OklahomaThe U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday widened the power of states over Native American tribes and undercut its own 2020 ruling that had expanded Native American tribal authority in Oklahoma, handing a victory to Republican officials in that state.
Baca lebih lajut »
U.S. Supreme Court expands state power over Native American tribesWASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday dramatically increased the power of states over Native American tribes and undercut its own 2020 ruling that had expanded tribal authority in Oklahoma, handing a victory to Republican officials in that state. In a 5-4 decision authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court ruled in favor of Oklahoma in its bid to prosecute Victor Castro-Huerta, a non-Native American convicted of child neglect in a crime committed against a Native American child - his 5-year-old stepdaughter - on the Cherokee Nation reservation.
Baca lebih lajut »
Corporate America fights Supreme Court abortion decisionCompanies led by Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are among those that won't respect the Supreme Court's decision on Roe, offering to pay travel expenses for employees seeking abortions.
Baca lebih lajut »
'This is not over': Harris warns Supreme Court may target gay marriage, contraception nextVice President Kamala Harris warned that other established rights such as same-sex marriage and access to contraception could come under assault from the Supreme Court next following the high court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Baca lebih lajut »
Senators Say Trump Supreme Court Nominees Misled ThemSens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) told reporters they were misled by Supreme Court justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, who both testified under oath that Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent. What do you think?
Baca lebih lajut »
Abortion battles in state courts after Supreme Court rulingAbortion bans are temporarily blocked in Louisiana and Utah, while a federal court in South Carolina says a law sharply restricting the procedure can take effect there immediately.
Baca lebih lajut »