These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
The Supreme Court wrestled Monday with a pair of cases that could help define the future of the Internet.
He and several other justices seemed to side with a key argument from the social media platforms: that decades of free speech jurisprudence mean government officials cannot compel people or businesses, including social media giants, to speak. A separate law in Florida prevents the social media platforms from rapidly changing their terms of service and threatens huge financial penalties.
Clement said were the state laws to stand, it would lead to massive disruptions for the platforms and even, in the interim, make them consider hosting nothing but content about puppies for its users in Florida.In court papers, lawyers for Texas and Florida said the social media platforms are discriminating against conservative views.
"Everyone, left right or center, should oppose government control of speech," Szabo said."Because as it may be your person in the White House today, we know that that will not be forever. And that's why the First Amendment is so important and so paramount."The justices will have to decide between radically different conceptions of what social media is.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar advised the justices to rule narrowly, focusing only on the biggest social media sites and how they are burdened by the Florida and Texas laws, and to leave those thorny issues about other platforms for another case and another day.The two trade associations — NetChoice and CCIA — are backed by groups across the political spectrum, from the U.S.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
The Supreme Court will hear challenges to Texas and Florida social media lawsThese cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
Baca lebih lajut »
Florida Asks State Supreme Court To Tank Abortion Ballot ProposalSara Boboltz is a reporter for HuffPost based in New York City. She can be reached at sara.boboltzhuffingtonpost.com.
Baca lebih lajut »
Florida Atlantic Owls vs South Florida Bulls Line MovementCollege Basketball line and odds movement for Florida Atlantic Owls vs South Florida Bulls on Feb 18, 2024.
Baca lebih lajut »
Boyi Gan lab - Houston, Texas (US) job with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterNew postdoctoral positions are open in a cancer research laboratory located within The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Baca lebih lajut »
Live updates: Supreme Court considers the future of social mediaThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments in a pair of cases that could transform how social networks have operated for decades.
Baca lebih lajut »
Watch Live: Supreme Court hears social media cases that could reshape how Americans interact onlineThe two cases concern Republican-backed state laws that aim to restrict social media companies like Facebook and X, formerly Twitter, from moderating content.
Baca lebih lajut »