The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a case against the federal government's actions concerning social media moderation has no standing.
The United States Supreme Court has determined that the White House and other federal agencies can ask social media platforms to remove content they consider potentially harmful misinformation.
Although the case, Murthy, Surgeon General, et al. v. Missouri et al., could have had wide-reaching impacts on interpretations of the First Amendment and free speech, the conservative-majority Supreme Court Federal agencies asking social media platforms to remove or flag content is nothing new and has been an ongoing issue during the COVID-19 pandemic and previous election cycles.
Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch wrote in their dissent that the case is “one of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years,” arguing that the decision not to hear the case is “regrettable.”
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court rules for NRA in New York government coercion battleLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Baca lebih lajut »
US Supreme Court sides with NRA in free speech ruling that curbs government pressure campaignsThe Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously backed the National Rifle Association in a First Amendment ruling that could make it harder for state regulators to pressure advocacy groups.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with governmentThe Supreme Court is siding with Native American tribes who said they faced increased costs after taking over management of their own health care programs from the federal government.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with governmentThe Supreme Court is siding with Native American tribes who said they faced increased costs after taking over management of their own health care programs from the federal government.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with governmentThe Supreme Court is siding with Native American tribes who said they faced increased costs after taking over management of their own health care programs from the federal government.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court sides with Native American tribes in health care funding dispute with governmentThe Supreme Court is siding with Native American tribes who said they faced increased costs after taking over management of their own health care programs from the federal government.
Baca lebih lajut »