Supreme Court Bans Affirmative Action: What It Means for College Admissions

Indonesia Berita Berita

Supreme Court Bans Affirmative Action: What It Means for College Admissions
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 24 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 63%

The Supreme Court has banned colleges from using race as admission criteria, essentially ending affirmative action. California did the same 25 years ago. WSJ ex

plains how what happened then can offer a roadmap for what could happen now. / Photo Illustration: Madeline MarshallIn-Depth FeaturesA grassroots basketball league in a remote part of China has the country excited for the American sport. WSJ’s Jonathan Cheng went to one of the biggest games to see what’s drawing thousands of people to the tournament.

Photo: Jade Gao/Agence France-Presse/Getty ImagesA WSJ analysis of dashcam footage and data from a Texas crash shows Tesla’s Autopilot system failed to recognize stopped emergency vehicles. Photo illustration: Ryan TrefesSince Lina Khan became Federal Trade Commission chair in 2021, she’s taken on Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon, and that’s made her a lightning rod for controversy. WSJ breaks down the battles she’s picked and why she’s willing to lose.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

WSJ /  🏆 98. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Activist Behind Supreme Court Affirmative-Action Cases Is Now Suing Law FirmsActivist Behind Supreme Court Affirmative-Action Cases Is Now Suing Law FirmsFirms that offer some fellowships for diverse candidates are accused of racial discrimination against straight, white men.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court ethics debate divides justices, court watchers, former clerksSupreme Court ethics debate divides justices, court watchers, former clerksImposing a code of ethics on the justices who serve on the Supreme Court is a political idea that — like much of the rest of American politics — has split proponents and opponents down the middle.
Baca lebih lajut »

Indiana Supreme Court denies rehearing on abortion restrictions clearing way for law to take effectIndiana Supreme Court denies rehearing on abortion restrictions clearing way for law to take effectIn their response to the denial for a rehearing, the Supreme Court ruled as an order with separate opinions, a rehearing is unnecessary.
Baca lebih lajut »

The Supreme Court’s Next Big Tax Case Demands Clarence Thomas’ RecusalThe Supreme Court’s Next Big Tax Case Demands Clarence Thomas’ RecusalThis coming term, the Supreme Court will hear United States v. Moore, a case that could determine the constitutionality of a hypothetical wealth tax.
Baca lebih lajut »

Indiana Supreme Court denies ACLU appeal on abortion banIndiana Supreme Court denies ACLU appeal on abortion banThe Indiana Supreme Court denied the American Civil Liberties Union's request for an appeal on the state's near-total abortion ban on Monday, allowing the strict abortion ban to take effect immediately in the Hoosier State.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-03-06 06:26:21