Supreme Court justices asked if the U.S. would allow a Guantanamo Bay detainee to testify about his alleged torture and confinement by the CIA.
The question arose at the end of oral arguments about the government's effort to stop two ex-CIA contractors from testifying about the treatment of that detainee, Abu Zubaydah, at an alleged "black site" in Poland.
This undated file photo provided by U.S. Central Command, shows Abu Zubaydah, date and location unknown. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments about the government's ability to keep what it says are state secrets from a man tortured by the CIA following 9/11 and now held at the Guantanamo Bay detention center. At the center of the case being heard Wednesday is whether Abu Zubaydah can get information related to his detention.
Zubaydah in 2017 asked a U.S. district court to authorize subpoenas to question ex-CIA contractors James Mitchell and John Jessen about a site in Poland where Zubaydah alleges he was held and tortured. Their testimony would be part of an investigation being conducted by Polish authorities. The United States flag flies inside of Joint Task Force Guantanamo Camp VI at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, March 22, 2016.Fletcher told the court Wednesday that Zubaydah is not being held "incommunicado" but is subject to the same restrictions as other Guantanamo detainees.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court Returns for New Term—With Scant Courtroom AudienceWhen the Supreme Court justices sat down to hear their first in-person case since March 2020, the only people there to watch were a few of their spouses, retired Justice Anthony Kennedy, essential court personnel and accredited journalists
Baca lebih lajut »
Back in black: U.S. Supreme Court opens its momentous new termU.S. Supreme Court justices took a step back toward normalcy on Monday on the first day of their new nine-month term as they conducted oral arguments in person for the first time in 19 months due to the COVID-19 pandemic, holding a muted and polite session in a socially distanced courtroom.
Baca lebih lajut »
Highlights from opening day at the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court — for the first time in more than a year — returned to its courtroom to begin a new blockbuster term that will include a major Second Amendment dispute and a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade.
Baca lebih lajut »
New Supreme Court term, Powerball jackpot, Nobel Prize: 5 things you need to know MondayAfter more than a year of debating its docket virtually due to COVID-19, the Supreme Court returns to the courtroom Monday to conduct oral arguments in person.
Baca lebih lajut »
New Supreme Court term comes as public support for the institution hits record lowThe Supreme Court enters a new term with abortion rights on the docket. MSNBC Political Analyst Michelle Goldberg and Adam Serwer, Staff Writer for the Atlantic join American Voices with Alicia Menendez to discuss the Supreme Court’s shift to the right as public support for the institution is at an all time low.
Baca lebih lajut »
Justice Breyer says return to in-person Supreme Court arguments is a 'big improvement'Justice Stephen Breyer reflected on the Supreme Court's return to in-person oral arguments, saying he prefers the high court's usual structure over the virtual system the nine jurists started using after the pandemic began
Baca lebih lajut »