A Post review of 30 years of race and ethnicity data from the eight states that currently ban race-based admission policies in higher education shows how a federal ban on affirmative action might harm minority students across the United States.
students who attended less selective universities have poorer outcomes, such as lower graduation rates, graduate school enrollment and income.
Bans on affirmative action have ripple effects beyond individualized outcomes. Dan Ly, assistant professor of medicine at UCLA, found in athat the enrollment of underrepresented students at public medical schools fell from 15 percent to 10 percent following state bans. These impacts reverberate to public health outcomes, Ly said: “When you see someone who looks like you and may understand your experience better, you’re just more likely to have trust in your physician and listen to them more. That leads to better care.”Texas, where affirmative action was prohibited from 1996 to 2003, automatically admits
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court says state courts can review election law, rejects independent state legislator theoryThe Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that state legislators are not the ultimate authority on how elections are conducted, reasoning that state courts can review election rules enacted by lawmakers.
Baca lebih lajut »
White House defends student loans move ahead of Supreme Court ruling: Biden 'fought for you'The White House defended its $400 billion student debt transfer ahead of a SCOTUS ruling that could strike down the program. '[Our message is] that President Biden has fought for you every step of the way,' principal deputy press sec. Olivia Dalton said.
Baca lebih lajut »
Biden to join 'Deadline: White House' for live interview after Supreme Court rulingsNEW: President Joe Biden to join NicolleDWallace on DeadlineWH Thursday at 4 P.M. for a historic live interview
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court rejects independent state legislature theory in major election law caseBREAKING: The Supreme Court declined to limit the authority of state courts to nullify federal election rules set by state legislatures.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court justices rule state lawmakers do not have exclusive control over elections in key decisionThe Supreme Court ruled in a major elections case that could affect voting boundaries, mail-in ballots, and more forthe 2024 election and beyond.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court rejects ‘independent state legislature’ theoryThe Supreme Court rejected a fringe legal theory that would have let states run elections with little judicial oversight. The 6-3 decision turns away a conservative push to empower state legislatures.
Baca lebih lajut »