Samuel Alito’s Assault on Wetlands Is So Indefensible That He Lost Brett Kavanaugh

Indonesia Berita Berita

Samuel Alito’s Assault on Wetlands Is So Indefensible That He Lost Brett Kavanaugh
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

If you want to feel really cynical about the Supreme Court read Alito’s opinion in Sackett.

Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the court is remarkably brazen about this approach—so brazen that Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored a sharp opinion accusing him of failing to “stick to the text.” Alito began with a long history of the Supreme Court’s struggles to identify the “outer boundaries” of the Clean Water Act, as if to explain why the time had come for the court to give up wrestling with the text and just impose whatever standard it prefers.

Moreover, many wetlands have a periodic connection to bigger nearby waters that ebbs and flows with seasons, rainfall, and other natural factors. Some maintain a continuous connection underground while appearing to be disconnected on the surface. For nearly 50 years, the EPA has shielded these areas from destruction. Now they are in open season for developers, because they lack a “continuous surface connection” to neighboring waters.

, Kagan described the court’s “appointment of itself as the national decision-maker on environmental policy.” Assuming that unearned role, the majority has once again chosen “to cabin the anti-pollution actions Congress thought appropriate.”

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

Slate /  🏆 716. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Roberts: Supreme Court seeks to assure public on justices’ ethicsRoberts: Supreme Court seeks to assure public on justices’ ethicsThe chief justice says he’s mulling ways to address worries about 'standards of conduct.'
Baca lebih lajut »

Chief Justice Roberts says Supreme Court can do more on ethics, but offers no specificsChief Justice Roberts says Supreme Court can do more on ethics, but offers no specificsChief Justice John Roberts says there is more the Supreme Court can do to “adhere to the highest standards” of ethical conduct. It's an acknowledgment that recent reporting about the justices’ ethical missteps is having an effect on public perception of the court. Speaking at a law dinner where he was honored with an award Tuesday, Roberts provided no specifics but said the justices “are continuing to look at the things we can do to give practical effect to that commitment.” He said he is “confident there are ways to do that.' The court has resisted adopting an ethics code of its own. But all nine justices recently signed a statement of ethics. Roberts' remarks suggested he knows that statement is not enough to quiet critics.
Baca lebih lajut »

DeSantis dreams up a 7-2 conservative Supreme CourtDeSantis dreams up a 7-2 conservative Supreme CourtThink the Supreme Court is conservative now? Wait until you see what DeSantis wants to do with it. (via Deadline: Legal Blog)
Baca lebih lajut »

Chief Justice Roberts says Supreme Court can do more to 'adhere to the highest standards'Chief Justice Roberts says Supreme Court can do more to 'adhere to the highest standards'Chief Justice John Roberts' comments come as an acknowledgment that recent reporting about the justices' ethical missteps is having an effect on public perception of the court.
Baca lebih lajut »

Chief Justice John Roberts says putting fence around Supreme Court was ‘hardest decision’Chief Justice John Roberts says putting fence around Supreme Court was ‘hardest decision’Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. says the hardest decision he has made in his nearly two decades on the Supreme Court was putting up a fence around the court last year amid protests over the justices rolling back national abortion rights.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-26 21:27:12