Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy

Indonesia Berita Berita

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 6abc
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 22 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 63%

'This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,' Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.

The Supreme Court on Thursday gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel's reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.

"This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence," Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court. At another point, Kagan asked readers to "Recall what the bottle looks like " before inserting a color picture of it. The packaging of the toy, which retails for around $20, notes in small font: "This product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery."

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

6abc /  🏆 250. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Ruff day in court for Arizona doggy toy makerRuff day in court for Arizona doggy toy makerA squeaky dog toy by Arizona-based VIP Products infringes on the Jack Daniels trademark, the U.S. Supreme Court said in a ruling Thursday.
Baca lebih lajut »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyThe Supreme Court is giving whiskey maker Jack Daniel’s a reason to raise a glass
Baca lebih lajut »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyJack Daniel’s, based in Lynchburg, Tennessee, wasn't amused. Its lawyers argued that the toy misleads customers, profits “from Jack Daniel’s hard-earned goodwill” and associates its “whiskey with excrement.
Baca lebih lajut »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” Justice Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.
Baca lebih lajut »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toy'This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,' Kagan wrote in an opinion for the court.
Baca lebih lajut »

Ruff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyRuff day in court: Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in dispute with makers of dog toyThe Supreme Court on Thursday gave whiskey maker Jack Daniel's reason to raise a glass, handing the company a new chance to win a trademark dispute with the makers of the Bad Spaniels dog toy.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 21:29:30