Five years after Greta Thunberg tweeted a since-deleted story about climate change, social media posts are still distorting what was said.
, a Harvard University atmospheric chemistry professor and the"top climate scientist" referred to in the Grit Post story, later said he never warned that climate change would wipe out all of humanity unless humans stop using fossil fuels by a specific date.
"The ‘wiping out of humanity by 2022’ is a total distortion of what I said or meant" during a 2018 speech, heFirst, Thunberg’s original tweet didn’t predict that the world would end on June 21, 2023, as social media posts suggested. Rather, it said that a scientist had warned of humanity’s eventual demise if humans didn’t stop using fossil fuels within five years.
Second, that scientist later said reports were wrong that he claimed climate change will wipe out humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.Our Sources
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Why was anyone listening to Greta Thunberg in the first place?'Why was some random child propped up as the arbiter of climate change policy in the first place?' -ZacharyFaria
Baca lebih lajut »
Greta Thunberg says France targeting climate activistsSwedish climate activist Greta Thunberg said on Thursday that campaigners were being 'systemically targeted with repression' in France, where she attending a finance summit.
Baca lebih lajut »
Greta Thunberg Voices Support for Environmental Group Banned by France'This is about the right to protest and this is about defending life,' said the 20-year-old climate campaigner.
Baca lebih lajut »
PolitiFact - Why doesn’t the Supreme Court have a formal code of ethics?Federal laws, some of which were recently tightened, require Supreme Court justices to report gifts valued at more than a few hundred dollars. But there are no official ethics standards for the Supreme Court as there are for lower courts.
Baca lebih lajut »
PolitiFact - Hochul’s defense of migrants’ presence in New York state has legal basis, experts sayMigrants who come to the United States to seek asylum are legally present until their cases are heard and their asylum status is granted or denied. But a new Biden administration rule puts limits on who can seek asylum.
Baca lebih lajut »
PolitiFact - No, tanks and troops are not proof of looming military action within the U.S.An article shared on social media claimed that photos and videos of military tanks and troops are proof that the military is poised for action in the U.S. and Canada. We found much simpler and less sinister explanations.
Baca lebih lajut »