Opinion | Jessica Levinson: Supreme Court's new abortion case will help define John Roberts' legacy. - NBCNewsTHINK
until the court heard the case. This is not necessarily an indication of Roberts' willingness to strike down Louisiana's law. Roberts' vote likely indicates nothing other than his view that it's better to play the long game when trying to move the law in one direction — in this case, toward allowing states to legally impose many, many restrictions on a woman's ability to gain access to an abortion.
If the court ignores a recent precedent it will prove the justices are not just “calling balls and strikes,” as Roberts himself said a few years ago. Still, it remains to be seen which option is more important to Roberts. Behind door No. 1? Respecting Supreme Court precedent and maintaining the integrity of the court. Door No. 2? Voting consistent with his previous position that Louisiana's law does not present an undue burden on abortion access. Door No. 2 represents a significant erosion of a woman's constitutional right to choose.
There may actually be another option — let's call it door No. 3, or perhaps Roberts' escape hatch. One of the issues is whether the physician abortion providers are the proper people to bring the case to the court. Put another way, the question is whether
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Abortion Returns To The Supreme Court This Week With Case On Hospital PrivilegesThe Supreme Court will hear a major abortion case on Wednesday that is focused on whether doctors should be required to have local hospital privileges.
Baca lebih lajut »
Abortion rights face stern new test at conservative U.S. Supreme CourtThe U.S. Supreme Court this week gets its first chance to consider new curbs on ...
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court set to hear critical Louisiana abortion caseJune Medical Services v. Russo (previously v. Gee) is a challenge from Louisiana abortion providers to a 2014 state law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges with a nearby hospital.
Baca lebih lajut »
President's power to can independent agency heads faces testA case being argued at the Supreme Court on Tuesday could threaten the structure of agencies that form an enormous swath of the federal government
Baca lebih lajut »
Feminists Go on the Offensive as Supreme Court Decides Monumental Abortion Case, June v. RussoThis Wednesday, March 4, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in the Louisiana case June v. Russo, in which the court will once again review an unnecessary state law that requires doctors performing abortions to have hospital admitting privileges near their clinic.
Baca lebih lajut »
Mainland China reports sharp drop in new coronavirus cases on March 1Mainland China had 202 new confirmed cases of coronavirus infections on Sunday, ...
Baca lebih lajut »