Justices Alito and Thomas Actually Brought Up a Dormant Abortion Ban During Supreme Court Hearing

Indonesia Berita Berita

Justices Alito and Thomas Actually Brought Up a Dormant Abortion Ban During Supreme Court Hearing
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 Jezebel
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 29 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 63%

Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

During a hearing about the abortion pill mifepristone, the two far-right jurists sounded like they believe the Comstock Act of 1873 can be enforced right now.on the lawsuit and how we got here.

Alito and Thomas invoking Comstock is a terrifying development, and the only small silver lining is that their questions make it crystal clear that Democrats Hawley responded to Thomas: “We don’t think that there’s any case of this court that empowers FDA to ignore other federal law. With respect to the Comstock Act as relevant here, the Comstock Act says that drugs should not be mailed, either through the mail or through common carriers , so we think that the plain text of that is pretty clear.Heads up: This is the strategy. They don't need to win Congress.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

Jezebel /  🏆 153. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Supreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companiesSupreme Court justices cautious about limiting government's communication with social media companiesDuring oral arguments on Monday, both liberal and conservative justices on the Supreme Court appeared wary of imposing broad limits on how the government can communicate with social media companies about problematic content it thinks should be removed. The case at issue is called Murthy v. Missouri, and it asks the court to determine whether the Biden administration’s communications with platforms coerced the companies to take down content, like misinformation about covid vaccines, thereby violating the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »

Two Supreme Court justices are reminding us how to act like adultsTwo Supreme Court justices are reminding us how to act like adultsIn our polarized society, there is an urgent need for civil debate. We are glad two U.S. Supreme Court justices and ideological opposites, Amy Coney Barrett...
Baca lebih lajut »

Sen. Eric Schmitt dismisses concerns over skeptical justices in censorship Supreme Court caseSen. Eric Schmitt dismisses concerns over skeptical justices in censorship Supreme Court caseSen. Eric Schmitt isn't dismayed by seemingly skeptical questions from Supreme Court justices during oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri on Monday over the federal government's ability to direct and coordinate with social media companies.
Baca lebih lajut »

Justices skeptical of broad limits on how the government speaks to platformsJustices skeptical of broad limits on how the government speaks to platformsLiberal and conservative justices alike seemed wary of conservative states’ arguments against the Biden administration in arguments over Murthy v. Missouri.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court Liberal Justices Silent on Drag Show BanSupreme Court Liberal Justices Silent on Drag Show BanThe president of West Texas A&M University has successfully blocked drag shows on campus.
Baca lebih lajut »

Justices hear arguments on Texas SB 4 immigration lawJustices hear arguments on Texas SB 4 immigration lawThe Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments about whether to allow back into effect a law allowing state and local authorities to deport migrants.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-24 23:17:49