Judge in Trump classified documents case to hear more arguments on dismissing charges

Aileen Cannon Berita

Judge in Trump classified documents case to hear more arguments on dismissing charges
Washington NewsU.S. NewsPolitics
  • 📰 ksatnews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 74 sec. here
  • 7 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 47%
  • Publisher: 53%

Prosecutors and defense lawyers in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump are due in court for the first time since the judge indefinitely postponed the trial earlier this month.

FILE - The indictment against former President Donald Trump is photographed on Friday, June 9, 2023. Prosecutors and defense lawyers in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump are due in court Wednesday, May 22, 2024, for the first time since the judge indefinitely postponed the trial earlier in May. against former President Donald Trump are due in court Wednesday for the first time since the judge indefinitely postponed the trial earlier this month.U.S.

Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith's team, which brought the case, will argue against that request. Trump is not expected to be present for the hearing.The arguments come one day after a newly unsealed motion reveals that defense lawyers are seeking to exclude evidence from the boxes of records that FBI agents seized during athat the August 2022 search was unconstitutional and “illegal” and the FBI affidavit filed in justification of it was tainted by misrepresentations.

“The warrant was supported by a detailed affidavit that established probable cause and did not omit any material information. And the warrant provided ample guidance to the FBI agents who conducted the search. Trump identifies no plausible basis to suppress the fruits of that search,” prosecutors wrote.

The defense motion was filed in February but was made public on Tuesday, along with hundreds of pages of documents from the investigation that were filed to the case docket in Florida. Those include a previously sealed opinion last year from the then-chief judge of the federal court in Washington, which said that Trump's lawyers, months after the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago,to abide by a grand jury subpoena and to turn over materials to investigators, rejecting defense arguments that their cooperation was prohibited by attorney-client privilege and concluding that prosecutors had made a “prima facie" showing that Trump had committed a crime.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

ksatnews /  🏆 442. in US

Washington News U.S. News Politics Donald Trump

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Prosecutors Can Ask Trump About Fraud Case, E. Jean Carroll If He Testifies, Judge RulesProsecutors Can Ask Trump About Fraud Case, E. Jean Carroll If He Testifies, Judge RulesAlison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.
Baca lebih lajut »

Donald Trump 'Angling' For Incarceration, Prosecutors Warn JudgeDonald Trump 'Angling' For Incarceration, Prosecutors Warn JudgeProsecutors claim that Trump is deliberately looking for jail time for violating a gag order
Baca lebih lajut »

Prosecutors urge judge to hold Trump in contempt again for more gag order violationsProsecutors urge judge to hold Trump in contempt again for more gag order violationsAt a contentious hearing with Trump looking on, lawyers from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office told the judge that Trump had violated the gag order four more times.
Baca lebih lajut »

Prosecutors repeatedly reference Trump’s Access Hollywood scandal after judge ruled tape itself 'prejudicial'Prosecutors repeatedly reference Trump’s Access Hollywood scandal after judge ruled tape itself 'prejudicial'New York prosecutors continue to heavily reference the infamous leaked Access Hollywood tape capturing Trump's crude comments about women despite judge deeming the tape itself prejudicial.
Baca lebih lajut »

Trump New York trial: Judge scolds prosecutors as Stormy Daniels recounts 2006 sex storyTrump New York trial: Judge scolds prosecutors as Stormy Daniels recounts 2006 sex storyThe judge presiding over the New York hush money trial against Donald Trump on Tuesday scolded prosecutors after porn star Stormy Daniels recounted graphic details about her alleged sexual encounter with the former president 18 years ago.
Baca lebih lajut »

Florida Sen. Scott criticizes judge and prosecutors outside Trump hush money trialFlorida Sen. Scott criticizes judge and prosecutors outside Trump hush money trialThis is additional taxonomy that helps us with analytics
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 07:19:58