Israel’s Supreme Court has delayed the first of three pivotal hearings on the legality of the judicial overhaul, spearheaded by the far-right government of Benjamin Netanyahu, after the country’s attorney general expressed staunch opposition to the plan.
Before the Court delayed the hearing for 12 days, petitions challenging Levin’s refusal were set to be heard on Thursday. Under normal circumstances, experts said, Levin’s position would have been represented by the attorney general.
“This is all highly exceptional,” said Amichai Cohen, a constitutional law professor and senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank. Until the current government took office, he said, the attorney general and government rarely took separate positions. “Usually there is a dialogue in which a unified position is adopted,” he said.In a filing to the court on Monday, Baharav-Miara said Levin’s actions had led to numerous vacancies.
Netanyahu’s coalition — dominated by religious and ultranationalist parties — says the country’s non-elected judges wield too much power and must be reined in. Critics of the overhaul, who represent a wide swath of Israeli society, say the plan will destroy the country’s system of checks and balances and concentrate power in the hands of Netanyahu and his allies.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Court orders new election map in Alabama after lawmakers defy Supreme CourtA three-judge panel from a federal district court in Alabama ruled Tuesday a special master must step in and draw a new congressional map since the state Legislature defied the Supreme Court and refused to add a second majority Black district to its 2023 plan.
Baca lebih lajut »
How to Treat the Supreme Court’s Camera PhobiaSCOTUS justices allow just 50 people to watch them work, rather than the hundreds of millions of citizens that could see proceedings on livestreams and television.
Baca lebih lajut »
Student group asks Supreme Court to rule that college bias-response teams are unlawful, chill speechA student-aligned free speech group has asked the Supreme Court to rule that bias response teams at colleges and universities chill speech and violate the First Amendment.
Baca lebih lajut »
Why Wisconsin Republicans are talking about impeaching a new state Supreme Court justiceThe unprecedented attempt to impeach and remove Justice Janet Protasiewicz from office comes as the court is being asked to throw out legislative electoral maps drawn by the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2011 that cemented the party's majorities in the Assembly and Senate.
Baca lebih lajut »
Matter Labs co-founder proposes 'Ethereum Supreme Court' for on-chain disputesMatter Labs CEO Alex Gluchowski wants to see an Ethereum Supreme Court and lower on-chain courts which serve to resolve “truly extraordinary” smart contract disputes.
Baca lebih lajut »