It is not evident the Supreme Court will support a strict historical approach that results in widespread invalidation of the nation’s gun laws, even if that was what was implied by Bruen.
United States v. Rahimi
, which struck down the federal law temporarily prohibiting persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. To come into play, the law requires that the person be “subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner.” Such an order typically requires a court finding that the person “represents a credible threat” to a domestic partner.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
What we learned as walk-off walk secures Giants' ninth straight winICYMI: The SFGiants yet again pull off a late comeback and finish off the Padres on a bases-loaded walk with two outs in the bottom of the ninth to extend their win streak to nine.
Baca lebih lajut »
Companies Brace for Supreme Court Ruling That Could Prompt Scrutiny of Diversity InitiativesA looming affirmative action ruling has prompted companies to consider how it might affect their own diversity policies
Baca lebih lajut »
Affirmative action, student debt among pending 2023 Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court will announce more decisions in cases it has heard since October this week, which could include whether colleges and universities can consider race in making admission decisions and if Biden’s student-loan forgiveness program is lawful.
Baca lebih lajut »
Native American tribes say Supreme Court challenge was never just about foster kidsNative Americans say the Supreme Court has reaffirmed their power to withstand threats from states in many areas.
Baca lebih lajut »
Why the Supreme Court still hasn't decided on Biden's student loan forgivenessMillions of Americans with student debt are awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of a Biden administration policy to forgive large amounts of loans.
Baca lebih lajut »
Maryland Supreme Court limits gun ballistics evidence in criminal proceedingsIn a 4-3 opinion, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled to end the long-standing practice of calling in firearms experts during criminal proceedings to testify that a particular gun fired a specific bullet.
Baca lebih lajut »