Allegations that Twitter's hosting of unrelated content on its platform contributed to an Islamic State terrorist attack prompted Supreme Court justices to ask parties Wednesday about what liability a business would have for dealing with Osama bin Laden.
The Supreme Court was deliberating the scope of two anti-terrorism statutes after plaintiffs alleged the Big Tech platform contributed to a 2017 ISIS attack in Istanbul by hosting content not directly related to the specific incident. The core of the issue is whether a family's claims sufficiently allege Twitter knowingly provided"substantial assistance" to a terrorism act that would allow relatives of those killed in the attacks to seek damages under U.S. anti-terrorism law.
— Howard Mortman February 22, 2023 “Could, under your theory ... CNN have been sued for aiding and abetting the September 11th attacks?" Kavanaugh asked Eric Schnapper, a University of Washington law professor who represented the plaintiffs, saying the video became a"famous tool for recruiting" into the terrorist organization.
The case argued Wednesday, Twitter v. Taamneh, arose after an ISIS terrorist opened fire at a nightclub in Istanbul in 2017. The shooting killed 39 people, including Nawras Alassaf. Alassaf's family filed a suit against Twitter, Meta, and YouTube, alleging that they had aided and abetted in recruiting and promoting ISIS causes to the public.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court to hear arguments on Google and Twitter’s liability for terrorists’ online postingsThe Supreme Court will hear arguments this week in a pair of cases about the legal liability of tech platforms like Google and Twitter for content posted by terrorists.
Baca lebih lajut »
Did Five Supreme Court Justices Lie to Congress About Abortion Views?'Their auditions for lifetime appointments on the highest court in the land were an affront to the rule of law and the Constitution they are sworn to uphold.'
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in Google case with potential to upend the internetAccording to the plaintiffs in the case — the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, who was killed in a 2015 ISIS attack in Paris — YouTube’s targeted recommendations violated a US antiterrorism law by …
Baca lebih lajut »
Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Spotlights Abortion Law, Voting AccessAn election for a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court could change the political trajectory of the crucial swing state
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court probes social media immunity in ISIS videos disputeThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case alleging that by recommending videos that spread violent Islamist ideology, YouTube bears some responsibility for the killing of Nohemi Gonzalez in the 2015 Paris attacks.
Baca lebih lajut »
Family of American terror victim asks Supreme Court to curb immunity for social mediaThe family of an American college student killed in the Paris terror attacks is asking the US Supreme Court to roll back legal immunity for social media companies.
Baca lebih lajut »