One of three former Wisconsin Supreme Court justices asked to review possible impeachment of a current justice is refusing to tell a judge who else was looking into that question
of liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz if she does not recuse herself from a pair of redistricting lawsuits.was violating the state open meetings law by not letting the public attend its meetings. Prosser is the only former justice to say publicly that he is among the group.
When asked directly by the judge if he would name who the other two former justices were, Prosser said, “No.” Likewise, Vos attorney Matthew Fernholz said he would not disclose their names without first consulting with Vos. Vos has repeatedly declined to name who he asked, only saying he tabbed three former justices to look into impeachment.
Vos said he was asking the group to “come back with an analysis to say whether or not is possible and how it should occur.” “It could be very well, Justice Prosser, that this is not a committee that is not subject to public meetings law,” Remington said. “We just don’t know because the facts are uncertain.”
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice refuses to disclose names of others looking at impeachmentOne of three former Wisconsin Supreme Court justices asked to review possible impeachment of a current justice is refusing to tell a judge who else was looking into that question.
Baca lebih lajut »
Wisconsin Supreme Court won't hear longshot case trying to head off impeachmentThe Wisconsin Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit seeking an order blocking any attempt from the state Legislature to impeach Justice Janet Protasiewicz
Baca lebih lajut »
Wisconsin Supreme Court won't hear longshot case trying to head off impeachmentThe Wisconsin Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit seeking an order blocking any attempt from the state Legislature to impeach Justice Janet Protasiewicz.
Baca lebih lajut »
Michigan Supreme Court orders all judges to use people’s preferred pronouns in courtThe Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered all judges to address people in court by the pronouns they use or by “other respectful means.”
Baca lebih lajut »
Seattle asks Supreme Court to review decision that makes encampment sweeps more difficultThe decision blocks camping bans unless a city can provide shelter beds for every homeless person in the area.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Could Trigger Hundreds of Billions in Corporate Tax Cuts 'With the Stroke of Pen'A new report warns that huge tax gifts for corporations and 'a $340 billion hole in the federal budget' are among the potential consequences of a case SCOTUS is set to hear in December.
Baca lebih lajut »