In a blow to groups trying to get voter-driven initiatives on the ballot, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a law criminalizing per-signature payment is constitutional.
Voters in Arizona voted on various ballot propositions that deal with a number of issues, including debt collection, in-state tuition, and campaign spending. Here's a look at the results.The appeals court ruled the law has a chilling effect on free speech rights of people trying to get proposed laws on the ballot.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that some of the bonus programs the company used ran afoul of the 2017 law. However, the court's ruling did not touch on the measure's constitutionality. The ban on per-signature payments is one of several restrictions on petition collectors enacted by the Republican-controlled Legislature after liberal groups used the citizen initiative process to make changes lawmakers opposed, including an increase in the minimum wage.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Mystery powder letters sent to Kansas Republicans, Trump, Supreme Court Justice ThomasWASHINGTON — A series of threatening letters containing a mysterious white powder is raising concerns that Republican lawmakers in Kansas and across the nation who received them are being targeted by someone cryptically calling themselves 'your secret despirer,' according to authorities and recipients of the letters.
Baca lebih lajut »
Did RFK Jr. Win a Supreme Court Case Against Mandatory Vaccination?❌ No, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did not win a Supreme Court case against mandatory vaccination.
Baca lebih lajut »
Ketanji Brown Jackson 'likely done' writing Supreme Court decisions this termSCOTUS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has likely finished writing decisions on the merits this term after writing her sixth majority opinion last week. With 18 cases left to decide this term, Jackson is the justice with the most authored opinions thus far.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court declines appeal from Christian school fighting transgender housingThe Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a Christian college in Missouri that sued the Biden administration over its decision to shield transgender people from housing discrimination.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court turns away veterans who seek disability benefits over 1966 hydrogen bomb accidentThe Supreme Court has rejected an appeal on behalf of some U.S. veterans who want disability benefits because they were exposed to radiation while responding to a Cold War-era hydrogen bomb accident in Spain. The justices not did comment Tuesday in turning away an appeal from Victor Skaar, an Air Force veteran in his mid-80s. Skaar, of Nixa, Missouri, filed class-action claims seeking benefits for him and others who say they became ill from exposure to radiation during the recovery and cleanup of the undetonated bombs at the accident site in Palomares, a village in southern Spain, in 1966. A federal appeals court rejected the class-action claims. The Supreme Court’s action leaves that ruling in place.
Baca lebih lajut »