California Vote Gives NCAA A Choice: Allow Athlete Endorsements Or Risk Annihilation By Antitrust Law

Indonesia Berita Berita

California Vote Gives NCAA A Choice: Allow Athlete Endorsements Or Risk Annihilation By Antitrust Law
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 69 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 31%
  • Publisher: 53%

As the Fair Pay to Play Act moves forward, the NCAA faces a Hobson’s choice: either capitulate and allow college athletes to sign at least a limited range of endorsement deals, or ban California member colleges and risk an antitrust lawsuit that could lead to the association’s annihilation.

, any attempt by the NCAA to attempt to ban member colleges that comply with California’s Fair Pay to Play Act would very likely be viewed more nefariously than other NCAA rules—perhaps as tantamount to an illegal form of wage fixing or an illegal group boycott.

Although the NCAA has long maintained internal rules to limit athletes’ financial freedom, even the NCAA’s Principle of Amateurism—a principle that at times has been afforded great deference from certain federal courts—almost certainly cannot trump free trade principles or government mandates.

If American legal history teaches us anything, it is that even the most powerful industries that have longed claimed special antitrust exemptions have ultimately found themselves subject to the inevitable reach of the Sherman Act. For example, important Supreme Court decisions have found antitrust violations against the big railroads, large gasoline companies and others that were once perceived as being untouchable.

Thus, it seems nearly certain that by 2023, U.S. college athletes will gain the opportunity to endorse a limited range of products and services. All that remains to be seen is whether the NCAA will voluntarily conform its practices to the Fair Pay to Play Act to avoid conflict with California members’ legal obligations, or instead risk a federal court antitrust ruling mandating that the NCAA change its athlete endorsement rules, and perhaps more.

If the NCAA opts for the reasonable approach of voluntary change, the future could move relatively smoothly for America’s monopolist college sports trade association.

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

Forbes /  🏆 394. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

Google faces a new antitrust probe by 50 attorneys generalGoogle faces a new antitrust probe by 50 attorneys generalThe news follows the announcement of a joint state Facebook probe led by the attorney general of New York.
Baca lebih lajut »

California closer to letting college athletes make moneyCalifornia closer to letting college athletes make moneyThe California Assembly has passed a bill aimed at paying college athletes, setting up a confrontation with the NCAA that could jeopardize the athletic futures of powerhouse programs like USC, UCLA and Stanford.
Baca lebih lajut »

California lawmakers challenge Trump's bid to expand oil drilling and fracking statewideCalifornia lawmakers challenge Trump's bid to expand oil drilling and fracking statewideCalifornia moved to block the Trump administration from allowing new fracking and other oil and gas wells in national parks and wilderness areas across the state.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-03-13 04:38:37