An upcoming Supreme Court fight over the Biden administration's student debt relief plan could see the 6-3 conservative majority employ a similar doctrine that quashed the Obama administration's landmark power plant emissions rule.
President Joe Biden's plan intends to forgive as much as $20,000 in student debt for up to 16 million borrowers. However, some legal experts have suggested the court's conservative supermajority could scrutinize the program under the so-called major questions doctrine.The justices relied on the doctrine in 2021 to bar the U.S.
"Last year's EPA ruling confirmed that the executive branch needs clear congressional authorization to issue sweeping regulations that have vast economic and political significance. The Biden administration’s $400 billion student loan program not only is economically significant, but it also is unprecedented," Karen Harned, chief legal officer for JCNF, told the Washington Examiner.
But Harned contended the 2003 law could not be utilized under pandemic justifications"without any input from Congress or the American people," an argument that has been supported by former lawmakers who helped secure the law's passage, such as former House Speaker Rep. John Boehner . While some challengers to Biden's plan believe the justices will apply similar scrutiny as they did to the EPA rules, other legal experts have speculated the justices may see a distinction between the student loans case and prior rulings that limited executive authority.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
U.S. Supreme Court's 'major questions' test may doom Biden student debt planThe finances of many Americans are in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court as it hears arguments Tuesday in appeals by President Joe Biden's administration of lower court rulings blocking his plan to cancel $430 billion in student debt.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court seems to favor tech giants in terror caseThe Supreme Court seems skeptical of a lawsuit trying to hold social media companies responsible for a terrorist attack at a Turkish nightclub that killed 39 people
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to 'Unconstitutional' Arkansas Anti-BDS Law'The struggle for collective liberation requires global solidarity and economic pressure,' said RepRahida after SCOTUS declines to hear an appeal of Arkansas' anti-BDS law. 'Today's decision is a travesty, but the people will not be silenced.'
Baca lebih lajut »
Ex-Trump attorney backs Supreme Court dismissing case to reinstate TrumpAttorney Jenna Ellis said the Supreme Court's decision was predictable and 'the right call.'
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court struggles to draw line on how Big Tech aids terrorists who use platformsSupreme Court justices searched Wednesday for a way to determine when large social media companies used by terrorists cross the line into aiding and abetting them in their attacks.
Baca lebih lajut »
Highly paid oil rig worker merits overtime, U.S. Supreme Court saysAn oil rig supervisor who earned more than $200,000 a year working for Houston-based Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc is entitled to overtime pay, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday in a decision with costly implications for the oil and gas industry.
Baca lebih lajut »