A Supreme Court Win for Due Process—Written by Brett Kavanaugh?

Indonesia Berita Berita

A Supreme Court Win for Due Process—Written by Brett Kavanaugh?
Indonesia Berita Terbaru,Indonesia Berita utama
  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 20 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

The 6–3 opinion clocks in at only six pages, but it does *a lot* in that space.

Reed, who is Black, seeks to overturn a 1998 conviction for the 1996 rape and murder of 19-year-old Stacey Stites, who was white. Stites had been strangled with a belt outside of Bastrop, Texas. Investigators initially suspected Stites’ husband, police officer Jimmy Fennell. Their focus shifted to Reed, however, when they matched his DNA to three spermatozoa found in Stites’ vaginal cavity. Even though Reed and Stites were having an affair, Reed initially denied knowing her.

. Two people who did time with Fennell testified that, while incarcerated, he indicated that he strangled Stites with his belt.So the first way to understand the Supreme Court’s decision is as a turning point in Reed’s capital litigation. The above-recited facts trickled into public view over time, and they form a harrowing tale of injustice. The group taking up Reed’s cause includes

Berita ini telah kami rangkum agar Anda dapat membacanya dengan cepat. Jika Anda tertarik dengan beritanya, Anda dapat membaca teks lengkapnya di sini. Baca lebih lajut:

Slate /  🏆 716. in US

Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama

Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.

What the Supreme Court's decision in the fight over abortion pills means for mifepristone accessWhat the Supreme Court's decision in the fight over abortion pills means for mifepristone accessThe Supreme Court is allowing access to the abortion pill, mifepristone, amid a legal challenge to its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. Here's what to know about the legal battle.
Baca lebih lajut »

What comes next after the Supreme Court blocked -- for now -- restrictions on abortion pills | CNN PoliticsWhat comes next after the Supreme Court blocked -- for now -- restrictions on abortion pills | CNN PoliticsThe abortion rights community and its allies in the Biden administration secured a striking victory from the conservative Supreme Court with an order Friday night that stopped restrictions on medication abortion drugs from taking effect.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court preserves access to the abortion pill, for now: What's next?Supreme Court preserves access to the abortion pill, for now: What's next?The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday blocked, for now, lower court orders that would have imposed new restrictions on the abortion pill mifepristone while a lawsuit by anti-abortion groups and doctors seeking to ban it proceeds.
Baca lebih lajut »

Supreme Court will rule against Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, legal experts predictSupreme Court will rule against Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, legal experts predictUnfortunately for borrowers, legal experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court will greenlight President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan.
Baca lebih lajut »

California Supreme Court rejects lawsuit challenging Newsom's plan to treat mental illnessCalifornia Supreme Court rejects lawsuit challenging Newsom's plan to treat mental illnessGov. Gavin Newsom's CARE Court plan to address severe mental illness, substance use and homelessness is on track to move forward after the high court rejected a legal challenge.
Baca lebih lajut »

What's next for abortion pill after Supreme Court's actionWhat's next for abortion pill after Supreme Court's actionNothing will change for now. That's what the Supreme Court said Friday evening about access to a widely used abortion pill.
Baca lebih lajut »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 06:35:27