There are many reasons to fight for the Equal Rights Amendment. This case offers a particularly poignant one. SAAM2023
Per ethics rules, judges are not supposed to lobby at all, and certainly not on laws that they themselves will rule on. But the chief justice took a very public stand against the legislation, claiming it would flood the federal courts with “a whole host of millions of domestic relations disputes” and “be invoked as a bargaining tool within the context of divorce negotiations”—implying that women would lie about violence in divorce proceedings.
After the Civil War, the Supreme Court cut back on the meaning of equality under the 14th Amendment, creating a series of precedents that would support segregation in the South for almost a hundred years. As a result of these rulings, Black Americans could sue to declare a law unconstitutional or a state official’s actions unconstitutional, but private individuals and entities were not covered under the amendment.
The work done by Ginsburg focused on state laws that expressly discriminated—laws that, for instance, prohibited women from administering estates. Such laws were actions by the state.was different: The question was whether Congress had the power to create a federal civil rights remedy based on states’ failure to act to remedy gender discrimination.
Of course, that logic is as tortured in the 21st century as it was in the 19th. Even Rehnquist recognized Brzonkala’s injury, writing, “If the allegations here are true, no civilized system of justice could fail to provide her a remedy for the conduct of respondent Morrison. But under our federal system that remedy must be provided by the Commonwealth of Virginia, and not by the United States.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
Supreme Court likely to have final say over abortion pill mifepristone, expert saysFor now, the drug that the Food and Drug Administration approved in 2000 remains at least immediately available in wake of the separate rulings by judges in Texas and Washington state.
Baca lebih lajut »
Supreme Court may decide fate of 'conversion therapy' bans for childrenThe Supreme Court could decide in the coming weeks whether to take up a challenge to a Washington state law that bans therapists from trying to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of children.
Baca lebih lajut »
Democratic lawmaker Ocasio-Cortez wants US Supreme Court Justice Thomas impeachedDemocratic U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said on Sunday she wants Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be impeached and his advisers probed after a media report described luxury trips he has taken over decades, funded by a Republican donor.
Baca lebih lajut »
AOC Wants To Know Who “Advised” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to Not Disclose GiftsSeveral Democrats wrote a letter to Chief Justice Roberts saying the gifts create “a very, very serious problem.”
Baca lebih lajut »
Gallagher says Wisconsin Supreme Court race 'massive loss,' calls for 'soul-searching'Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI) didn't downplay the devastating GOP loss in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race Tuesday and urged the party to undergo brief soul-searching.
Baca lebih lajut »
Lawmaker Ocasio-Cortez wants Supreme Court Justice Thomas impeachedRep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday said she wants Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be impeached after a media report described luxury trips he has taken over decades, funded by a Republican donor.
Baca lebih lajut »