When impeachment proceedings begin this week in a new venue — the House Judiciary Committee — they won’t necessarily be a sober-minded moment in American history focused strictly on substance for many of the committee members.
Then, in October, Gaetz led a group of 50 or so House Republicans who walked uninvited into a closed-door deposition with one of the impeachment investigation witnesses. of the protest was that Democrats were conducting “secret interviews.” But this was a falsehood, since over 100 members of Congress across three different committees — nearly half of them Republicans — were able to attend the closed-door depositions.
But it’s unclear that a formal rebuke would matter to Gaetz, who represents the Florida Panhandle and has made a career of thumbing his nose at conventions. Elected just 18 months ago, he has a knack for using Congress as a platform to promote himself as an outsider. What’s unclear is whether anything of substance can be accomplished with such tactics. Jordan, 55, has been a politician for 25 years, spending a decade in the Ohio Legislature before being elected to Congress in 2006.
Jordan has already played a major role in the impeachment fight, after McCarthy moved him into a slot on the Intelligence Committee for the witness hearings. Jordan led the Republican effort, coordinating talking points and playing the role of chief press spokesman for his party. During the hearings, Jordan often made loud speeches in the form of a question, providing sound bites for Fox News and other conservative media outlets.
In addition to sitting on the Judiciary Committee, Swalwell is a permanent member of the Intelligence Committee, so he too will be a familiar face to those who watched the witness hearings. Swalwell generally refrained from histrionics during those two weeks, but he was quick to engage in confrontations with Republicans on the committee at certain points, serving as something of an enforcer for Schiff, the Intelligence chairman.
Indonesia Berita Terbaru, Indonesia Berita utama
Similar News:Anda juga dapat membaca berita serupa dengan ini yang kami kumpulkan dari sumber berita lain.
White House balks at participating in this week's impeachment hearingTeam Trump appears to be boycotting the Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry, after weeks of whining about not being able to participate
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump Questions Timing of Impeachment HearingPresident Trump defended his decision to not send a lawyer to a House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing later this week, citing its timing and calling the broader inquiry a “hoax.”
Baca lebih lajut »
GOP congressman says having attorneys at impeachment hearing would be to the 'President's advantage'Rep. Tom McClintock, a Republican member of the House Judiciary Committee, has argued that it would benefit President Trump to have his counsel participate in the committee's upcoming impeachment hearings
Baca lebih lajut »
Top Republican on House Judiciary Committee calls for Adam Schiff to testifyRep. Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, is the latest Trump ally to call for Rep. Adam Schiff, who has been leading House Democrats' impeachment inquiry into the President and Ukraine, to provide testimony
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump faces two impeachment deadlines as inquiry shifts focusU.S. President Donald Trump faced two deadlines in Congress on Sunday as Democrats prepared to shift the focus of their impeachment inquiry from fact-finding to the consideration of possible charges of misconduct over his dealings with Ukraine. The Democratic-led House of Representatives Judiciary Committee
Baca lebih lajut »
Trump faces two impeachment deadlines as inquiry shifts focus - Business InsiderTrump faces two deadlines Sunday as Democrats prepared to shift focus of the impeachment inquiry from fact-finding to the possible charges.
Baca lebih lajut »